Recent comments in /f/baltimore

No-Lunch4249 t1_iw3c1dj wrote

Yeah I think a lot of places that pursue this have a publicly owned electrical provider, so while it’s public it’s not really directly controlled by the city

Choptank Electric Co-Op on the eastern shore is pursuing this also, but that’s very rural and it’s a bit of a different challenge

1

No-Lunch4249 t1_iw388xl wrote

Not entirely accurate. Exclusivity in franchising agreements was outlawed nationally decades ago. But at that point Comcast already had its claws in Baltimore, and the simple fact is that the startup cost on the infrastructure to provide city wide internet is so much that it doesn’t really make sense for a new company to try and wedge in.

This is why pursuing neutral host infrastructure legislation, where the city or a third party owns the fiber, or providing a municipal option (see Chattanooga) is the only real route forward.

13