Recent comments in /f/baltimore

moderndukes t1_j0mrcqu wrote

Dude what did bike lines do to you that you can’t even understand that I’m just saying “install bike lanes and the issue gets solved?”

> I’d rather scooters be banned completely than ridden on sidewalks. They are dangerous to pedestrians and drivers.

Ohhhhh you’re just a NIMBY about bike lanes, this all makes sense now.

0

socatsucks t1_j0mntek wrote

Right! Forget all the corruption and the shitty roads and the massive heroin problem and the economic disparity and the lack of quality public transportation and on and on and on. It’s the people running the red lights that are the REAL problem. And the solution? Expand the surveillance presence 100 fold! We need every Baltimore citizen’s every move to be recorded at all times from every angle. /s

1

PoopIsAlwaysSunny t1_j0mne5h wrote

No, the cause is scooters thinking their convenience trumps the safety of pedestrians.

You’re the one trying to solve the problem by prioritizing improperly. If scooters don’t feel safe on the road, they can walk on the sidewalk. That’s a perfectly valid choice they have.

Making pedestrians unsafe isn’t an option.

I’d rather scooters be banned completely than ridden on sidewalks. They are dangerous to pedestrians and drivers.

0

dopkick t1_j0mejoc wrote

It can't be said enough - Jong Kak is by far the best Korean BBQ. They bring a ton of sides (banchan) and use charcoal. It makes all the difference in the world, IMO. Regular Korean BBQ is... sad.

−6

moderndukes t1_j0mbb0u wrote

You’re really not understanding me. Here’s the sequence causing this issue:

  • People want to bike or scooter.
  • People try on the streets.
  • The streets don’t have proper bike infrastructure, people feel unsafe.
  • People bike/scoot on the sidewalks where they feel safer.
  • Pedestrians feel unsafe on the sidewalks.

You’re trying to solve the problem allllll the way down at step 5 and only for the pedestrians, when that doesn’t address what caused that to happen: the issue of bikers/scooter…ers feeling unsafe on the roads. The lack of proper bike infrastructure is the cause. The effect of not building it while banning them from sidewalks is people will just completely stop biking/scooting at all.

1

PoopIsAlwaysSunny t1_j0m6xzt wrote

Riders feeling safe is not an excuse to make pedestrians unsafe. Yes, improved infrastructure would help this, but even with that there would be dickheads who want to ride on sidewalks. I've seen people ride down thames st in front of the restaurants, as if that is safe or necessary when the promenade is on the other side of the street.

0

moderndukes t1_j0m2ghn wrote

The charts show the amount of vehicles parked at Cross Street Market (corral or not) decreasing by 24% after the implementation of the pilot program. What do you attribute that to? Ridership in general being lower for the latter period or has there also been an increase of vehicles parked in other nearby zones during that period (and thus, presumably, people parking farther and walking)?

1

moderndukes t1_j0m1nbw wrote

More infrastructure wouldn’t just be nice but it is the thing to solve the problem. Riders feel far safer riding on the sidewalks than they do on the streets in the city - if they felt safe on the streets, they’d be riding on them instead. Bike infrastructure is the only way to actually change it for the better.

1

MayorRoyce t1_j0l9sms wrote

I like the idea, but that specific corral is hard to use because of the chain across the road. You have to ride up on the sidewalk and (going east) dismount to lift your bike or scooter up to the sidewalk. Not a complaint about the corral but the poor way the street was blocked off. Bollards would be better.

1