Recent comments in /f/books

Reneeisme t1_j68n9qx wrote

For ostensively the same reason but in my opinion, Colleen Hoover is worse. I’ve read two. I read the first because it was everywhere and on lots of lists and it was horrible. Badly written badly plotted with terrible characters. I read the second in case the first was a fluke. Nope. I read Twilight for the same reason (it’s popularity) and also thought it was far from good, and the plot was also problematic at times (having to do with the creeper Edwards treatment of Bella mostly) but I could at least appreciate what teen girls liked about it. There was at least a story there.

I seriously do not understand who is loving Colleen Hoover. She writes psychopaths who victimize others and then have sex. There’s some abuse or murder and more sex and then it’s over. Who is enjoying this? If you’re there for the erotica, there are way better ways to get it.

6

canehdianchick t1_j68m35o wrote

What books have you read that were absolute stand alone stand outs?! You can’t really compare them to anything but they changed you the moment you read them? Looking for lands not yet wandered. Seeking a story I haven’t yet experienced through other characters or worlds in other pages.

Thanks!

3

vanZuider t1_j68ly51 wrote

In the books, there's also a (somewhat) long setup for a literally shitty joke; in book 1 >! Twin Lannister !< is introduced, and it is mentioned offhand that some people joke about how he's probably >! shitting gold. !< Towards the end of book 3, >! he's shot while taking a dump, and his killer dryly notes that he did not, in the end, shit gold. !<

3

canehdianchick t1_j68lrhg wrote

I recently took up reading again after years of feeling too busy to escape. Clock Cuckoo Land by Anthony Doerr was the perfect choice. Not only did I get lost in the 3 different worlds it explores— the book itself is an ode to the importance of books, reading, and the ways that they can alter the paths of many— or tangle them together.

3

PhysicsIsWhyIDrink t1_j68lepk wrote

Discussion

I retain significantly more of what I read if I talk about it with others. And this doesn’t have to be person to person. When I finished a book, I immediately look for threads on it to see what people have said about it. Sometimes someone will bring up something challenging the ideas in a book, sometimes people give further context to something, sometimes people will just interpret something entirely differently making me go back and reread to see if I can get their perspective on it etc. It’s basically repetition for me.

I even do this with fiction books. I’m a very literal reader. I don’t look for symbolism or between the lines meanings during my first reading. I prefer to just read for the story, and then go back and look for meaning. Threads afterwards help a lot with forming my own opinion.

3

wordyshipmate82 t1_j68j8ut wrote

I agree entirely, I love Lolita even though Humbert disgust me because I don't have to relate to the protagonist to enjoy reading. And I think most real humans are morally ambiguous at some point or another, so characters without deep flaws are unrealistic and poor writing.

I agree with everything you said, actually, "challenge our perspectives..." which is exactly the point of good literature, beyond entertainment, it forces us to confront unpleasant realities, and by proxy, ourselves.

6