Recent comments in /f/books
codykonior t1_j68mfyi wrote
Reply to comment by AtLeastThisIsntImgur in What is the meaning of the depth Patrick Bateman goes into about music in American Psycho? by ChairmanUzamaoki
Yeah, I guess we’re all a collection of other people’s opinions.
canehdianchick t1_j68m35o wrote
What books have you read that were absolute stand alone stand outs?! You can’t really compare them to anything but they changed you the moment you read them? Looking for lands not yet wandered. Seeking a story I haven’t yet experienced through other characters or worlds in other pages.
Thanks!
compaqdeskpro t1_j68m05m wrote
Reply to comment by ChairmanUzamaoki in What is the meaning of the depth Patrick Bateman goes into about music in American Psycho? by ChairmanUzamaoki
That's not the vibe I get, all I can see is him rambling on about music and his guests are uncomfortable or unimpressed at best, or laughing at him at worst, and then he lashes out. I think he cares about music.
vanZuider t1_j68ly51 wrote
Reply to comment by thewidowgorey in What’s the longest wait you’ve seen for chekhov's gun to be used? by I_Am_Slightly_Evil
In the books, there's also a (somewhat) long setup for a literally shitty joke; in book 1 >! Twin Lannister !< is introduced, and it is mentioned offhand that some people joke about how he's probably >! shitting gold. !< Towards the end of book 3, >! he's shot while taking a dump, and his killer dryly notes that he did not, in the end, shit gold. !<
youaresofullofitt t1_j68lwdi wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Which are some good ways to take the main teachings of a book? by dt_L21
Looks like chatgpt wrote this
anothercomputeralt17 t1_j68ltmw wrote
I read this and Educated within a few weeks of each other. It made me feel like I grew up rich, when we were just lower middle class at best.
canehdianchick t1_j68lrhg wrote
Reply to comment by OwlFeather21 in Weekly Recommendation Thread: January 27, 2023 by AutoModerator
I recently took up reading again after years of feeling too busy to escape. Clock Cuckoo Land by Anthony Doerr was the perfect choice. Not only did I get lost in the 3 different worlds it explores— the book itself is an ode to the importance of books, reading, and the ways that they can alter the paths of many— or tangle them together.
PhysicsIsWhyIDrink t1_j68lepk wrote
Discussion
I retain significantly more of what I read if I talk about it with others. And this doesn’t have to be person to person. When I finished a book, I immediately look for threads on it to see what people have said about it. Sometimes someone will bring up something challenging the ideas in a book, sometimes people give further context to something, sometimes people will just interpret something entirely differently making me go back and reread to see if I can get their perspective on it etc. It’s basically repetition for me.
I even do this with fiction books. I’m a very literal reader. I don’t look for symbolism or between the lines meanings during my first reading. I prefer to just read for the story, and then go back and look for meaning. Threads afterwards help a lot with forming my own opinion.
Butchslap t1_j68l7vt wrote
Reply to comment by AtLeastThisIsntImgur in What is the meaning of the depth Patrick Bateman goes into about music in American Psycho? by ChairmanUzamaoki
I guess you're right.
...
Damnit!
laziestmarxist t1_j68kv1u wrote
I have basically no memories thanks to having severe ADHD, but boy do I remember how much I loved this weird ass book.
NOLA-Gunner t1_j68kr5m wrote
As some said, could have been abridged. I’ve also seen with non-fiction that an updated edition will sometimes have new and expanded chapters, so listening to the original audiobook will throw it off
Gobergoober t1_j68kr10 wrote
I grew up pretty poor and we moved like fifteen times before I was ten. I'm turn on whether I should read this book. Might be too much.
bhbhbhhh t1_j68kapx wrote
Indices, bibliographies, and endnotes tend to be left out
Euphoric-Low-9222 t1_j68k9ck wrote
Reply to comment by freemason777 in After 30+ years, 'The Stinky Cheese Man' is aging well by drak0bsidian
IMO, stopping the usage of any word hurtful or otherwise is like book burning.
Evening_Educator_236 t1_j68k5r0 wrote
Hello there, this might be ULTRA specific but are there any books covering sexualized wounds? Like I‘m thinking of a memoir or a psychology book.
wordyshipmate82 t1_j68jxmi wrote
The fact that she can love her parents after everything they did to her is pretty amazing, and perhaps connected to the fact that she was able to write about it.
[deleted] t1_j68jp4m wrote
[deleted]
Thornescape t1_j68jn78 wrote
There's a Youtuber named Elizabeth Filips that covers topics like this a lot. She has some interesting ideas about note taking and organization that sound a lot like what you're asking.
[deleted] t1_j68jhtg wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j68je07 wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_j68jafc wrote
[removed]
craigsauer t1_j68j974 wrote
Reply to comment by ChairmanUzamaoki in What is the meaning of the depth Patrick Bateman goes into about music in American Psycho? by ChairmanUzamaoki
I remember laughing out loud at his mention of cherimoya sorbet and trying to explain to a friend why it was funny.
wordyshipmate82 t1_j68j8ut wrote
Reply to comment by bachennoir in Does anyone actually like the catcher in the rye? by Piazytiabet
I agree entirely, I love Lolita even though Humbert disgust me because I don't have to relate to the protagonist to enjoy reading. And I think most real humans are morally ambiguous at some point or another, so characters without deep flaws are unrealistic and poor writing.
I agree with everything you said, actually, "challenge our perspectives..." which is exactly the point of good literature, beyond entertainment, it forces us to confront unpleasant realities, and by proxy, ourselves.
artweary t1_j68j61r wrote
Before you buy or borrow and audiobook, read the description to see if it is abridged or unabridged. Many come in both versions.
Reneeisme t1_j68n9qx wrote
Reply to comment by littleteacup77 in Why are Colleen Hoover books so divisive? by sunnywatermelon18
For ostensively the same reason but in my opinion, Colleen Hoover is worse. I’ve read two. I read the first because it was everywhere and on lots of lists and it was horrible. Badly written badly plotted with terrible characters. I read the second in case the first was a fluke. Nope. I read Twilight for the same reason (it’s popularity) and also thought it was far from good, and the plot was also problematic at times (having to do with the creeper Edwards treatment of Bella mostly) but I could at least appreciate what teen girls liked about it. There was at least a story there.
I seriously do not understand who is loving Colleen Hoover. She writes psychopaths who victimize others and then have sex. There’s some abuse or murder and more sex and then it’s over. Who is enjoying this? If you’re there for the erotica, there are way better ways to get it.