Recent comments in /f/books

MoscoeLucilfer t1_j6fpfz4 wrote

The easiest way to kill your love of reading is setting an expectation on yourself based on what you perceive other people think a reader should be (something I learned the hard way).

I may not read 500 page novels often, but I know I'm a reader because I enjoy the urge to read books I genuinely care about based on my personal tastes.

For example, I finished reading the visual novels Higurashi and Umineko last year. They're not traditional novels in hand, but I'm sitting and reading, immersed in the story and pictures. As a school teacher, I also tell my students that graphic novels (a book type that typically holds the attention for ADHD children) ARE real reading!

Plus, both visual novels are 100 hours+ long. I couldn't read it through one sitting. Both novels took me 2 and a half months to read. That's fine by me. It made me look forward to read every day in those months.

Right now, I suddenly have the urge to read "The Kybalion" because I'm attracted to occult knowledge, and one of my favorite childhood singers, Omarion, wrote a book titled "Unbothered: The Power of Choosing Joy" thats themed around spirituality. Kybalion is a very hard read, but my interest in it keeps me going. Omarion's book is an easy read, and I don't feel bad. It's about the content, not other people's perceptions.

To sum it up, pick a book that matches your tastes, interest, and style. Read for fun and pleasure. If reading YA or middle grade books will be easier, go for it! I enjoy the Dragon Masters and Magic Bunny series my 3rd graders love.❤

7

yellowyellow2 OP t1_j6fow6l wrote

I have the omnibus from the library so it’s all in order for me :) i just felt very sad about finishing Tehanu i guess. Of course i will move on and start loving what is ahead of me though, i do this every time. What will be REALLY sad is when there is no more earthsea at all for me to read. I’m sure I’ll love what’s next!

1

RoseIsBadWolf t1_j6fn48l wrote

Jane Austen wraps up a lot of her books quickly, especially Perusasion, Northanger Abbey and Mansfield Park. When she's done, she's done.

At least we know that Henry and Catherine have their happy ending.

Also, if you want to discuss more, there is r/JaneAusten

1

aurumae t1_j6fk5no wrote

I think the point I'm most trying to argue against is casting these relationships using our modern conceptions of sexuality. I don't think it's right to talk about gay or straight people, or to cast their relationships in these terms, in a society that did not think about sexuality in these terms

1

SoundbudsSlimCognito t1_j6fjy65 wrote

It can serve multiple purposes, though legally is it's most predominant. If by chance anything referenced has bearing on a real life thing, one can perceive the work as factual or at least an unflattering commentary/slander against that thing, resulting in legal prosecution. In this instance it serves the same purpose of putting "Caution Beverage Hot" on a coffee cup.

Another use case I can see is in cases of historical fiction, in which while the events are indeed based around historical facts, there is allot of author liberty taken in telling the story, and to dispel the idea it is indeed 100% fact, a clarification is given.

1