Recent comments in /f/books

MyOwnRobot t1_j6g8rck wrote

Love Ellroy! The sequels are also amazing. And the LA Quartet is rightfully considered a classic. LA Confidential is waaay more epic than the movie (which I nonetheless love).

7

Leviathan_Bakes t1_j6g76vs wrote

I devoured it. Finished in one day. For years I refused to read TJR because I thought she was overhyped and overrated but I read one short story of hers I got on KU then Evelyn Hugo and I haven’t looked back since. She is easily becoming one of my favorite authors

1

Icy-Ad2082 t1_j6g2ay3 wrote

Which is why I didn’t use the term straight or gay in either of my comments. The reason I responded to the initial comment was because I think that people often say this because it deletes male/male compassion from the equation, which I think straight American men are really more uncomfortable with than the sexual aspect. I’m not saying that two Spartans bustin’ a nut together makes them gay, like you said the term doesn’t apply to those people. But it does paint a different picture of how homosexual activity fit into there life and culture. The main thing I’m trying to get at is there consistent and significant incongruities in every cultures values around sex and how people actually behave, and a general impulse to “prudify” the past. I’m not saying this applies to you, you clearly know your history, but I feel the need to correct the record when people imply that Greek and Roman homosexual activities were compassion-less expressions of power. It’s not accurate, and people sometimes use it to claim that modern homosexual activity is somehow new.

3

Hedwin_U_Sage t1_j6g180y wrote

I thought your English and post was very articulate. I understood you completely.

A Clockwork Orange blows my mind. I haven't read it physically but I've listened to the audiobook. I whole book told in this first person POV and writen in the slang language of the main character and rapist, murderering criminal. In a way, it protects you from the horrors of what the gangs do. But once you translate it, you really feel the weight of the scene. And bad for the victims.

I also have a similar section in my book that kind of mimics the speech pattern of 'Nadsat'--the Cockney like underground slang the young of the country speak.

2

BitterStatus9 t1_j6fzxi6 wrote

Be willing to go back and re-read a passage or section again. Patience and focus are key!

Also, you will often see a word or phrase you don't know. If you can figure it out from context, good. If you can ignore it and still understand the sentence/meaning, good. But, if it occurs many times, you should stop and look it up in a dictionary or translator etc.

2

fourstarlasagna t1_j6fzchx wrote

In the beginning of Life, the Universe, and Everything there’s a really good bit about Arthur deciding today was the day he’d go mad and finding himself chasing a Chesterfield sofa across a prehistoric field shortly after. I don't know your dad but there’s a lot of room for analogies and loving silliness with this passage. I’m sorry you are having to do this.

2

rpbm t1_j6fufuu wrote

I read this in college 30+ years ago and loved it. It was my English class assignment. Afterwards, we had to “rebuild society” with just our (dozen or so) classmates. The project and book study lasted several months, possibly a whole semester. We were featured in the local (tiny) newspaper for our project.

1