Recent comments in /f/books
tomandshell t1_j6j5gpv wrote
Reply to I just finishes Of Mice and Men! by VravoBince
Yes, the shooting of the old dog foreshadows Lennie's fate at the end. Remember that Candy says that he shouldn't have a let a stranger shoot his dog. He makes everything seem inevitable--I enjoyed it even more the second time, as there are so many things that point toward the conclusion.
CertainDegree t1_j6j52v8 wrote
Reply to Just me, or was IT really too long? by KnightOfPanda
It's 1300 pages
It's fucking long !!
General-Skin6201 t1_j6j4tki wrote
Reply to comment by HugoNebula in Just me, or was IT really too long? by KnightOfPanda
It was book no. 18. So it's at least "late-early." :)
sekiroisart t1_j6j44t5 wrote
Reply to comment by XBreaksYFocusGroup in Weekly Recommendation Thread: January 27, 2023 by AutoModerator
those books are the exact opposite of what OP wants to read
nickjg613 OP t1_j6j42sm wrote
Reply to comment by horrifyingthought in Thriller books used to be an entertaining palate-cleanser for me. Now I can't get past the halfway point. by nickjg613
For sure. I feel like re-reads of old favorites are my comfort "genre" right now.
VravoBince OP t1_j6j3ycm wrote
Reply to comment by Yuzuxe in I just finishes Of Mice and Men! by VravoBince
I guess a lot flew over my head lol, I'll check some articles out. And thanks for the recommendation.
HugoNebula t1_j6j3fh2 wrote
Reply to comment by General-Skin6201 in Just me, or was IT really too long? by KnightOfPanda
In the grand scheme of things, IT is one of King's earlier works.
Yuzuxe t1_j6j3cy7 wrote
Reply to I just finishes Of Mice and Men! by VravoBince
The book is so full of symbolism, check out some articles if youre interested. Red Pony is also a good one from Steinbeck.
HugoNebula t1_j6j33a7 wrote
Reply to I don't understand why publishers tend to release larger versions of books first. by Matherno
> If anything it just reduces potential profit on release for the new books.
Literally the opposite—publishers make more money off the readers who will pay more to have a book straight away, or prefer the quality of a hardback. It divides the audience for a book into tiered payments, and makes more money off those happy to pay more.
horrifyingthought t1_j6j2ac0 wrote
Reply to Thriller books used to be an entertaining palate-cleanser for me. Now I can't get past the halfway point. by nickjg613
It's okay to have a comfort genre that doesn't challenge you, not everything needs to be "literature" to add value to your life. But have you considered that as you have grown up your comfort genre may have shifted?
[deleted] t1_j6j24t1 wrote
Reply to comment by Vorpishly in Just me, or was IT really too long? by KnightOfPanda
[removed]
tvp61196 t1_j6j14ia wrote
Reply to Speechify vs Libro.FM? by action_lawyer_comics
Unfortunately I don't have a solid answer for you as I almost exclusively use audible (aside from a few region locked audiobooks that require more questionable methods), but just a tidbit regarding sleep timers. Iphones (and probably android) have a timer app built in, with an option to "Stop Playing" when the timer runs out. This gives you the ability to add a sleep timer to any audio playing through your phone.
GuyTheFlower t1_j6j01wm wrote
Reply to comment by Negative-Net-9455 in Just me, or was IT really too long? by KnightOfPanda
>reign
**rein
Like you would do to a horse.
krokett-t t1_j6iyz3y wrote
Reply to comment by SabbyRinna in Can AI replace the authors? by [deleted]
I can see AI helping writers with stuff like dialogue or being more eloquent, maybe imitating a specific style. However the issue is that AI doesn't understand what is being written. It is likely that it would write nonsensical sentences.
If AI can reach the level of general intelligence, so it understands context, than it can possibly "write" somekind of story - likely still very derivative, but coherent. The issue is it's still very far away, if it's possible at all.
lucia-pacciola t1_j6iv9au wrote
The right to their own interpretation of the text.
lucia-pacciola t1_j6iv2aq wrote
Reply to Thriller books used to be an entertaining palate-cleanser for me. Now I can't get past the halfway point. by nickjg613
Not necessarily thrillers, sometimes a book just doesn't grab me. But actually the first example that comes to mind is a thriller. It was a new take on the Philadelphia Experiment folk tale, with people in the present continuing the research and dealing with the side effects. But about halfway through, I just wasn't feeling it, and DNF'd.
Now that I think about it, the thriller depends pretty heavily on good pacing and gripping prose, to keep the reader's interest and excitement throughout the story. So I guess maybe thrillers are less forgiving of author missteps. Other genres can better afford to lose some momentum, or just shift gears here and there. But a thriller needs to keep on banging away at full speed, or it just falls apart.
OceanCrawler7 t1_j6iu71f wrote
Reply to Are Isekai, portal litrpg and harem genre lite novels racist? Or pro colonialism? Pro pedophiliac? by elRigs83
Who could have expected that garbage, shovelware style books are in fact garbage.
amyaurora t1_j6iu37w wrote
Reply to Thriller books used to be an entertaining palate-cleanser for me. Now I can't get past the halfway point. by nickjg613
A lot of thrillers lately are leaning being psychological thillers vs just entertaining.
Just a fad I think.
moon_dyke t1_j6itsxx wrote
Reply to comment by Icy-Ad2082 in Dickens' David Copperfield: Were men more affectionate with each other in the 18th century? by angelojann
This is really interesting and makes a lot of sense, thank you!
jcargile242 t1_j6itlmv wrote
Reply to Just me, or was IT really too long? by KnightOfPanda
The Stand has entered the chat.
GrumpyBearBank t1_j6itcvw wrote
Reply to comment by b00kw0rm_ in It Ends With Us Recent Criticism by hmacias25
There is no reason that a romance relationship needing to be healthy in a novel. If anything, there are narrative reasons for them not being healthy.
It’s not the author’s responsibility to showcase healthy relationships. And frankly they aren’t usually very interesting.
Romance books are basically a form of porn. It’s fantasy. A torrid romance, unrequited love, rebellion, a dashing hero, yadda yadda.
And just like porn, nobody watches it for healthy sex. They watch porn for the visually striking and the taboo. People read romance for the saucy affairs.
I haven’t read this book and I never will. But it failing to showcase healthy relationships is a critique beside the point.
Trick-Two497 t1_j6isyrs wrote
Reply to I’m stuck and I need help from different perspectives please. - Middlemarch - chapter 15 by VastBadger7995
You might want to read the discussion thread for that chapter over at r/ayearofmiddlemarch. You'll have to search. We aren't that far yet this year.
GrumpyBearBank t1_j6isy7h wrote
Reply to comment by honestlyicba in It Ends With Us Recent Criticism by hmacias25
I work adjacent to the system.
At the majority of DV sentencings in my county, the victim shows up to speak (or has a left a statement with the DA’s Office) and is angry at the DA’s Office for prosecuting. And wanting forgiveness and leniency for the defendant. Or outright recanting.
It’s amazing and horrifying
docharakelso t1_j6j5lk3 wrote
Reply to The 10 Inalienable Rights of the Reader by swedish_librarian
That's a fine list and I'm particularly happy to add Bovary-ism to my lexicon