Recent comments in /f/books

tomandshell t1_j6j5gpv wrote

Yes, the shooting of the old dog foreshadows Lennie's fate at the end. Remember that Candy says that he shouldn't have a let a stranger shoot his dog. He makes everything seem inevitable--I enjoyed it even more the second time, as there are so many things that point toward the conclusion.

20

HugoNebula t1_j6j33a7 wrote

> If anything it just reduces potential profit on release for the new books.

Literally the opposite—publishers make more money off the readers who will pay more to have a book straight away, or prefer the quality of a hardback. It divides the audience for a book into tiered payments, and makes more money off those happy to pay more.

3

tvp61196 t1_j6j14ia wrote

Unfortunately I don't have a solid answer for you as I almost exclusively use audible (aside from a few region locked audiobooks that require more questionable methods), but just a tidbit regarding sleep timers. Iphones (and probably android) have a timer app built in, with an option to "Stop Playing" when the timer runs out. This gives you the ability to add a sleep timer to any audio playing through your phone.

2

krokett-t t1_j6iyz3y wrote

I can see AI helping writers with stuff like dialogue or being more eloquent, maybe imitating a specific style. However the issue is that AI doesn't understand what is being written. It is likely that it would write nonsensical sentences.

If AI can reach the level of general intelligence, so it understands context, than it can possibly "write" somekind of story - likely still very derivative, but coherent. The issue is it's still very far away, if it's possible at all.

1

lucia-pacciola t1_j6iv2aq wrote

Not necessarily thrillers, sometimes a book just doesn't grab me. But actually the first example that comes to mind is a thriller. It was a new take on the Philadelphia Experiment folk tale, with people in the present continuing the research and dealing with the side effects. But about halfway through, I just wasn't feeling it, and DNF'd.

Now that I think about it, the thriller depends pretty heavily on good pacing and gripping prose, to keep the reader's interest and excitement throughout the story. So I guess maybe thrillers are less forgiving of author missteps. Other genres can better afford to lose some momentum, or just shift gears here and there. But a thriller needs to keep on banging away at full speed, or it just falls apart.

1

GrumpyBearBank t1_j6itcvw wrote

There is no reason that a romance relationship needing to be healthy in a novel. If anything, there are narrative reasons for them not being healthy.

It’s not the author’s responsibility to showcase healthy relationships. And frankly they aren’t usually very interesting.

Romance books are basically a form of porn. It’s fantasy. A torrid romance, unrequited love, rebellion, a dashing hero, yadda yadda.

And just like porn, nobody watches it for healthy sex. They watch porn for the visually striking and the taboo. People read romance for the saucy affairs.

I haven’t read this book and I never will. But it failing to showcase healthy relationships is a critique beside the point.

2

GrumpyBearBank t1_j6isy7h wrote

I work adjacent to the system.

At the majority of DV sentencings in my county, the victim shows up to speak (or has a left a statement with the DA’s Office) and is angry at the DA’s Office for prosecuting. And wanting forgiveness and leniency for the defendant. Or outright recanting.

It’s amazing and horrifying

2