Recent comments in /f/books
scapppyyy t1_j6jwjfn wrote
Reply to Thriller books used to be an entertaining palate-cleanser for me. Now I can't get past the halfway point. by nickjg613
Wait, I was literally just talking about this. Those thriller, chick-lit type of books were pure entertainment and comfort for me, but lately I’ve found them to be insufferably bad. The last straw for me was “wrong place, wrong time” which I did not finish with only about 30% of the audiobook left - it was truly one of the worst listening/reading experiences I’ve ever had. I genuinely hated the book, but it has high reviews, and now I think it’s just me who has grown out of the genre!
absurdactuality t1_j6jwc2r wrote
Reply to I just finishes Of Mice and Men! by VravoBince
read this book in school. It was a pleasant read, couldn't tell you why though.
Wakamaka_number5 t1_j6jvwr2 wrote
Reply to Children's book author giving books to young Ukrainians: "A former local educator and author of children’s books set a goal last year of donating 500 special books to displaced Ukrainian children" by SAT0725
It's my understanding (I may be wrong, and I can't check this because I'm not in Ukraine!) that the Reading Club app (Android and Apple Store) is making its library of stories practically free (5 cents for unlimited membership) for people in Ukraine. I have heard that they would make it completely free but can't seem to do so when it's not free in other countries. Some kind of technicality with the store settings.
metromesa OP t1_j6jvnag wrote
Reply to comment by Maxtrix07 in Stephen King and short fiction by metromesa
Bazaar is one I haven't got yet, but will be on the lookout. Thanks!
SlySciFiGuy t1_j6jvifj wrote
Reply to I don't understand why publishers tend to release larger versions of books first. by Matherno
Those willing to pay more for hardbacks get first dibs. Seems reasonable.
notbusy t1_j6jvfyr wrote
Reply to comment by Dandibear in The 10 Inalienable Rights of the Reader by swedish_librarian
Oh, if only I could get all those hours of my life back!
GalaxyMosaic t1_j6jvakm wrote
Why is this a necessary discussion? Reading is a low-stakes solo endeavor and the rewards are all internal to the individual. STG people will turn anything into a toxic fandom.
GalaxyMosaic t1_j6jus38 wrote
Reply to comment by mind_the_umlaut in The 10 Inalienable Rights of the Reader by swedish_librarian
Careful, you'll awaken the luddites.
Mumbleton t1_j6jta49 wrote
Reply to Stephen King and short fiction by metromesa
I’m a big King fan and enjoy both his giant novels and his short story collections. For the intro to one of them he compares a story to dating. A novel is a serious relationship. Maybe it’s a good one, maybe it’s a bad one but it’s deep and there’s commitment involved. A short story is a kiss in the dark. Maybe it’s amazing and meaningful, but it’s also fleeting.
Maxtrix07 t1_j6jt69i wrote
Reply to Stephen King and short fiction by metromesa
Soo, his writing style has changed plenty over the years, and personally I think his newer books are amazing. 11/22/63 is top notch, and I just finished his most recent book Fairy Tale. Very different, but I really enjoyed it.
If It Bleeds is so damn good.
You didn't mention Bazaar of Bad Dreams, which is my favorite book of shirt stories by him. I'd recommend that
ggchappell t1_j6jsif9 wrote
One important thing about being a reader is understanding the meaning of the words one reads. And it looks like Daniel Pennac -- along with so many others -- might not have understood the word "inalienable".
People think it means that the right cannot be taken from you. That is not what it means. It means the right cannot be contracted away. And I don't like that. By calling the right not to read inalienable, Mr. Pennac is saying that I cannot make an agreement with someone: "I'll read every day if you pay me."
So, sure, they're rights. I'm fine with that. But let's not call them "inalienable".
corranhorn57 t1_j6js7br wrote
Reply to comment by Dandibear in The 10 Inalienable Rights of the Reader by swedish_librarian
I would like to replace the right to read out loud with that one.
spooteeespoothead t1_j6jrjmd wrote
Reply to Stephen King and short fiction by metromesa
Nothing to add to the conversation, but I just want to recommend King's Different Seasons collection! Every story is amazing.
SoulingMyself t1_j6jrezq wrote
Outside of 5 and 7, none of those need to be said. That's just reading.
6 sounds like something you should see a mental therapist about.
Liminal_Space_Cadet t1_j6jr006 wrote
Reply to comment by Umbrella_Viking in The letters of T. S. Eliot to Emily Hale that were kept sealed from 1956 to 2020 have been released for free online by RunDNA
He's the Girl Talk of modernism bro don't hate on him 🔥
icarusrising9 t1_j6jqsaz wrote
Reply to comment by Amzuja in The 10 Inalienable Rights of the Reader by swedish_librarian
You're contradicting what they said, and talking about stuff outside the context of Rights Theory. I just meant to point out that rights as "limited freedoms [...] guaranteed by governments" is sort of silly, since the whole point of rights are to push back on perceived violation of those rights.
Breadbp t1_j6jp86v wrote
I imagine her to appear around 15 or 16 since she estimated Josie to be 14 and a half and she said that Josie was shorter (until the last chapter where Josie was a little taller than Klara).
Then again Klara might not be as heavy as a real person, making it easy for Rick to carry her. She was supposed to ‘continue’ Josie but she was going to get uploaded to the body that Mr. Capaldi was creating so her physical appearance didn’t really matter.
​
I think around 16 makes the most sense but it’s hard to confirm
metromesa OP t1_j6jp7gy wrote
Reply to comment by Adjective-Noun-012 in Stephen King and short fiction by metromesa
Thanks for the well thought out response. I've heard of 'Seasons', but haven't read it yet. Will pick it up for sure now.
kyle242gt t1_j6jp6sn wrote
Reply to Stephen King and short fiction by metromesa
I read a lot (most) King voraciously for a long long time. I found I really enjoyed the way a lot of them were interrelated, particularly (maybe almost exclusively) the Dark Tower tie ins - for me, there were many "a-ha" moments where characters or concepts return (Everything's Eventual is a great example).
There's this obsessive sort of branching that gives me the feeling the DT story has been gnawing at his consciousness just about forever.
With that in mind, the short works feel more like a pressure relief valve.
"Yes, yes, yes DT, my master, my muse, I will write more about you soon, but let me scratch a couple itches and take a breath once in a while, 'kay?"
(PS - Needful Things is great, and a lot of it is short-storyish feeling, as the individual characters' backstories are sketched out)
RigasTelRuun t1_j6jp3uu wrote
11 - The right to not endlessly document every word on goodreads.
[deleted] t1_j6jp2up wrote
Umbrella_Viking t1_j6joz9c wrote
Reply to The letters of T. S. Eliot to Emily Hale that were kept sealed from 1956 to 2020 have been released for free online by RunDNA
Does he use a lot of intertextual references, I.e, copying multiple lines of someone else’s work, like he does in The Waste Land? Allusions are allusions but, dude, lifting like, line after line….
1zzie t1_j6joyea wrote
What about the right not have your reading surveilled? I'd add that to the list. 30 years after 1992, seems kind of important, especially with all the reading tech keeping tabs on you.
VravoBince OP t1_j6jobe5 wrote
Reply to I just finishes Of Mice and Men! by VravoBince
*finished
[deleted] t1_j6jwk0g wrote
Reply to The letters of T. S. Eliot to Emily Hale that were kept sealed from 1956 to 2020 have been released for free online by RunDNA
[deleted]