Recent comments in /f/books

franhawthorne t1_j6miqdj wrote

I'm trying to figure out the psychology of someone who wants personal letters made public... eventually. Is the person protecting the privacy of the other recipients and senders of the letters? In that case, why ever make them public? More likely, is it ultra-egoism and a need to control? (C'mon, do you really think the famous people are preserving the letters for History?)

3

steampunkunicorn01 t1_j6miavj wrote

Three Musketeers by Alexandre Dumas (Dumas got paid by the line, which had an interesting effect on the work, mainly giving it a modern readability due to the dialogue-heavy scenes and comedic situations the characters constantly found themselves in)

Northanger Abbey by Jane Austen (the first written of her novels, it is definitely the most like YA, but in a definitely good way. The characters are relatable (you may not ever meet a Lady Catherine from Pride and Prejudice, but everyone knows a John Thorpe in their lives) and the satire is relatable. Just change out gothic romances for YA or crime thrillers, gigs for sport cars, and Bath for London or New York and the satire still holds up)

Don Quixote by Cervantes (absolutely hilarious, with scenes that feel straight out of Monty Python or a Terry Pratchett novel)

7

Swingingbells t1_j6mhwoi wrote

>In 1949, eight years after James Joyce died, his letters began to travel the world. Thanks to microfilm technology, popularized a few years earlier, the contents of his archive at the University of Buffalo became more accessible to curious readers and meddlesome critics than ever before.

>T. S. Eliot encountered them thousands of miles away, at the British Museum, in London, where he came face to face with a past self: his own letters to the Irish writer, lit up on a projection screen before him. Such exposure made Eliot uneasy. Later, in a letter sent across the ocean to Emily Hale, a teacher at a boarding school in Massachusetts, Eliot recalled the anxiety he’d experienced that day in the museum: “I thought, how fortunate that I did not know Joyce intimately enough to have made personal revelations or to have expressed adverse opinions, or repeated gossip or scandal, about living people!”

From the New Yorker piece about it

17

maplestriker t1_j6mhev2 wrote

I only read ebooks out of convenience. I read a lot. If I bought physical copies I wouldn't be able to afford food and I also don't want to deal with storing them. Library isnt an option because it's a bit further away and I'm notorious for not returning the books in a timely manner, if they even have what i want to read. So ebooks it is.

1

HugoNebula t1_j6mf14z wrote

Again, it's a scale for maximising profit. As mentioned elsewhere, all of these formats cost relatively the same amount to print and bind, so the earlier, more expensive formats make more money for the publisher, and offer the consumer a choice, both in format and early access.

Usually, the hardback and the larger paperback are released together, the paperback being slightly cheaper. Then the B-format paperback comes some time after that. There used to be an A-format, or 'mass market' paperback that was the cheapest of all, but those have fallen out of fashion.

2