Recent comments in /f/books

mmillington t1_j6p276b wrote

The Splendor and Misery of Bodies, of Cities, the abandoned sequel to Stars in My Pocket Like Grains of Sand by Samuel Delany. A relationship Delany was in inspired Stars and the planned sequel, but when the relationship ended so ended his desire to write the sequel.

1

oldadapter t1_j6p1z5i wrote

Sure but I’m just saying that ‘reading’ has this flexibility/broader meaning for only a few contexts, not as standard rule - but braille can also be one of these. If someone can read by touch in that context, there’s no good reason someone can’t also read by listening in another. I agree, in most cases choosing the most clear, unambiguous term is going to be best (especially to make that braille/audiobook distinction) - but if the medium isn’t the important part of the conversation/context - it seems unnecessary to pick someone up for saying something like “oh yes I read that last year too and found it tedious” if they in fact felt or listened to the text.

1

LizzyWednesday t1_j6p10av wrote

Maybe it's me, but I like those kinds of "extraneous" chapters, like the whale anatomy chapters in Moby Dick or the 8 million "Still Knitting" chapters in A Tale of Two Cities.

For the record, I did read an abridged version of Les Mis and felt like a lot was missing/inaccurate, which I found extremely frustrating. Reading the full-length version was much more comfortable. *shrugs*

4

ms4720 t1_j6p0rkh wrote

Why not he sounds like a highschool student so they are targeted at his age range. Reading is an acquired skill best start with something simple. Good quality books assume a good quality reader and he ain't one yet. Start at the beginning and go from there.

4

LizzyWednesday t1_j6p07c0 wrote

Totally random, but despite the fact that Pickwick Papers is Anne Shirley's comfort book in Anne of the Island, and I was obsessed with the Anne books in my early teens, I have never actually read it. (I've read A Tale of Two Cities, and half-assed an abridged version of Great Expectations, not to mention having read A Christmas Carol which is short enough that I could probably read it aloud to/with my daughter to see how familiar she is with the story.)

2

LadyWolvesBayne t1_j6oznmw wrote

Ah, this book. I read it long ago when it was all the hype. Needless to say, it didn't vibe with me, mostly because I couldn't figure out what the book was about... the book itself didn't seem to know either.

I know what made this book so hyped back in the day, and I think it's the exact same thing that steals the focus away from the premise entirely and turns the whole thing into a wasted opportunity for something epic, IMO. If that was the plan, then marketing did an awful job at selling this book like something it definitely isn't.

I usually do not keep reading a book if I'm not feeling it, no matter how many pages in. You can give it another try, or you can move on to the next book!

*completely personal opinion, and rather unpopular for what I know.

1

Trick-Two497 t1_j6oyv8u wrote

Reply to audiobooks by eutychiia

I love them. I'm old enough that anything that isn't backlit I can't read anymore. And I'm on screens all day at work, so my eyes get tired of that as well. I like to read at bedtime, and they say not to be on screens during that time as well. So audiobooks it is. It took me a while to get used to them, but now I love them. If you find a good narrator, it's such a great experience.

3