Recent comments in /f/books

Trick-Two497 t1_j6picoe wrote

Typos are the job of proofreaders, not editors. It's the last step in the process.

There are several kinds of editors. The kind of editor that catches the issues you're talking about is a developmental editor I believe. They make sure the story is hanging together. If you're really interested, here is an article about all the different people involved in the editing/proofing process. https://www.gcu.edu/blog/language-communication/types-editors

Probably if you're not working with one of the big houses, your book isn't getting the full treatment. And if you're an indie, you're paying out of pocket. I proofed a book for a gal whose book needed 3 levels of editing it didn't get. Plus fact checking. She used quotes that weren't real or were paraphrased. I flagged those for her (she wasn't paying me for that). When she sent me a copy of the book, she hadn't fixed them.

3

plantnativemilkweed t1_j6pha1h wrote

I am so glad I saw this post. I am a huge reader of books and also listen to lots of audiobooks. I am always looking for audiobooks to listen to when I go jogging. I had never heard of Colleen Hoover and I saw this audiobook Verity by her that had thousands of amazing 5 star reviews. I could not believe how awful it was in so many ways. I could not finish this book it was so ridiculous. Even though it was supposed to be a thriller- I had no interest in even finding out how it ended.

I was curious how this book could be so popular, so I looked up the author. Turns out she was a YA writer and also wrote romance books. I have never read a romance book in my life (I'm 67) and have no interest in them.

1

AggressiveBowl t1_j6pg2kf wrote

Dan Wells' I am not a Serial Killer. Somehow got convinced that it would be a dark exploration of the deranged mind of a teenager on his path to become a serial killer, some sort of We need to talk about Kevin. Then monsters popped out of nowhere and it turns out that baby Bundy is actually not that much of a bad guy.

4

CrazyCatLady108 t1_j6pfjp4 wrote

Apologies, but your post does not contain enough for people to engage in conversation. Do you have something else to say about the book that you could edit into the text? Let me know if you edit it and I will reinstate your post.

Or, if you would prefer to share quick/brief reactions to a book you are currently reading or recently finished, you can comment in our weekly What We're Reading thread, accessible from our header atop the sub. Your book may even appear in the sub banner! Thank you.

1

CrazyCatLady108 t1_j6pfcwy wrote

Reply to audiobooks by eutychiia

Hi there. This subject has been very popular in the past. Please use reddit search and/or check the /r/books/wiki/faq.

0

MorriganJade t1_j6pf82d wrote

The first thing that comes to mind is the ridiculous translation of the title of The girl with all the gifts by Carey to Italian into The girl(as in teen) who knew too much. The girl is a child (and I see this mistake way too much in translation, it seems people forget that girl can mean child) and she actively knows too little for the whole book. I've wanted to suggest the book to multiple people in Italy and the translation is always annoying

Also the loosening skin by Aliya Whiteley, while I like the cover it looks like horror and the author is known for some horror, but it's literary fiction

1

MorriganJade t1_j6pe4zx wrote

Reply to audiobooks by eutychiia

I love audiobooks, some of them are read so beautifully and it's such a fun activity while walking. I only use them to reread though, I prefer to read with my eyes first

1

Timely-Huckleberry73 t1_j6pdrxg wrote

Apparently some people really like the p&v translations. They are supposed to be a very faithful and direct translation from Russian. However, I think this results in a text that reads very unnaturally in English. Constance Garnett on the other hand is criticized by some for taking too many liberties with the text. I prefer her method though because it reads so naturally and feels like it was written in English in the first place.

4