Recent comments in /f/books

baker8590 t1_jee9e8n wrote

Yes read the book. It has so much more depth to the problem solving and includes more of his screw ups along the way. It also really shows how he uses his humor to cope and a lot of that didn't make the movie (was also a lot more creative silly cursing). I also love the movie but there's a lot of technical working through stuff that they have to cut to have it flow smoother (and shorter) and be easy for the masses to understand.

1

Bilbebop t1_jee9e02 wrote

Of course. It just requires an incredibly creative and artistic mind. Most new genres are a combination of other genres (these genres don't have to be from the same media. Look how silent film combined itself with expressionism in the 1920s) we've seen musicians come up with strange combinations that could only be described as it's own genre (for example station to station by Bowie) so why shouldn't authors embrace the idea of creating a new genre. Though if an author is going to do this it's best off happening as an accident. Let your world, and your story , and your characters dictate your genre.

1

Demonic_Toaster t1_jee9b7v wrote

The book is 10 times funnier than the movie, the internal monologues that he has, is sort of addressed in the movie but they dont really focus on it. I have several favorites that are laugh out loud moments for me.

“Things are finally going my way. In fact, they’re going great! I have a chance to live after all!

LOG ENTRY: SOL 37 I am fucked, and I’m gonna die!”

1

Wide-Organization844 t1_jee98wd wrote

This. The most important thing is to read something that you enjoy reading. Then it won’t feel like homework. I have to read a lot for my job and it’s very hard to separate work reading from fun reading, so I have a certain author that I always go back to when I’m getting burned out and I always walk away with renewed passion.

2

Julieann1970 t1_jee85zc wrote

Modern life provides endless distractions and can leave us feeling that we are doing something wrong as there are not enough hours in a day to do what we ‘like’. Reading for leisure is such a pleasure (I didn’t mean it to come out like that but….). Allocate half an hour or so every day and stick to it. And enjoy!

1

of_thoughts t1_jee7yc0 wrote

Here is a recent post from the author of Beneath the Dragon Eye Moons.

https://www.reddit.com/r/financialindependence/comments/12641eu/a_creatives_route_to_fire/

"This year I'm looking at roughly $500k total income on the extremely conservative side, closer to $600k if I'm a little more aggressive with my estimates. Patreon's about half of that, with Amazon being the other half. Within Amazon, KU is 70% of my income."

2

of_thoughts t1_jee7r19 wrote

Here is a recent post from the author of Beneath the Dragon Eye Moons.

https://www.reddit.com/r/financialindependence/comments/12641eu/a_creatives_route_to_fire/

"This year I'm looking at roughly $500k total income on the extremely conservative side, closer to $600k if I'm a little more aggressive with my estimates. Patreon's about half of that, with Amazon being the other half. Within Amazon, KU is 70% of my income."

If you check out their Patreon they are at $30k/mo! So RR will let you build your audience but then you need to monitize those eyeballs somehow at it looks like 50% is Patreon and 50% is Amazon.

3

JimmiRustle t1_jee7emh wrote

Ah yes well a short attention span is very common with the Netflixes and TikToks.

The last half of the book is the best because it ties a lot of stuff together that you absolutely haven’t figured out yet.

But honestly, slave through it. It’s going to be a deflated experience if you skip half the book and it’s not a bad thing to think some parts of a book aren’t very exciting.

5

No_Poet_7244 t1_jee6y47 wrote

“Purple” prose is not gauged by any objective measure, and that subjectivity means that all but the most spartan of writing will be labelled as “purple” by someone. There are certainly hallmarks of good and bad prose, and general rules one should follow when writing, at least until they know how to break those rules effectively, but everyone uses a different yardstick to measure and some folks like their prose more descriptive.

8

Raindrops_On-Roses t1_jee6j6i wrote

It can't be a "lesser" version when the comment was "Why read at all?" They're definitely getting more than the nothing that was suggested. And it's not good or bad to value any part of these made-up, nonexistent stories and fake people. You could never pick up any piece of fiction, and it wouldn't matter. Beyond the enjoyment that you get out of them, they are utterly worthless. So let people do what they want. This thread is gatekeeping bullshit, and this sub is pretentious as fuck.

−3