Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

source4mini t1_j5p7vd5 wrote

LEGO executives currently voting on a commemorative set to celebrate the move: Fenway or a Dunkin

366

therealcmj t1_j5pgvu1 wrote

Will this go as well as the GE HQ move did for them?

35

candidcamerapeepshow t1_j5phijw wrote

The HQ employees must be shitting brick once they realize the CoL in Boston…

139

RailRoad_Candy t1_j5pjak7 wrote

Will they be leasing a building that also costs 25 cents a brick?

77

ZetaInk t1_j5pkoi3 wrote

The cheap and quick building solution the city needs

165

Quirky_Butterfly_946 t1_j5pl3hv wrote

And people wonder why no one can afford to live in Boston. Boston has the real potential to become the next silicon valley housing nighmare. It already has priced many out, now unless you make millions, you are not going to live in Boston and surrounding areas.

Why does Lego have to move to Boston and not another area of the state to abate the over development, dense congestion, and turning Boston into a city that no one recognizes any more.

So long Boston, it was nice knowing you.

−33

therealcmj t1_j5po0g3 wrote

> GE stock has dropped like 90% from it’s high, so I don’t think the company is doing well.

Exactly. That’s the joke.

> I’m sure LEGO is doing fine though.

For now. But they just announced their move to Boston.

35

amos106 t1_j5ppk7k wrote

Boston first belonged to the natives, then the puritans, then to the colonists, then the patriots, then the industrialists, and now it's changing hands to the corporate aristocrats. It's not fair but then again it never was. I look forward to more entitled posts on the sub about how bullshit this city is because it doesn't cater hard enough towards privilege.

6

MarquisJames t1_j5ppyo3 wrote

we better get a fucking zakim or fenway piece from this.

41

UltravioletClearance t1_j5pspq0 wrote

Enfield CT is in the Springfield MA metro area. Yikes. I hope all current and future workers are getting significant pay raises.

Companies insisting on putting their HQs in the most expensive neighborhoods of the most expensive city in the country then refusing to pay workers enough to live anywhere near the office really grinds my gears.

113

veryverycoolfellow t1_j5pytsn wrote

Exactly. Enfield is trash, Springfield is trash. Boston is expensive but the pay compensate accordingly in the area, especially if you’re willing to live within a 30-40 min commute it’s not that bad. Moving out of Enfield to Boston is the smartest move to make, Boston is expensive yes, but the quality of life out surpasses basically every city in the northeast by a mile.

25

Pittsburgh_Bob t1_j5q08cv wrote

There is so much horrible negativity in this thread for basically no reason

63

Maxpowr9 t1_j5q13fy wrote

It's why many are predicting a lot of rural hospitals are gonna start closing like crazing this decade. What nurse/doctor wants to move to the middle of nowhere for meh pay compared to a major city?

6

Adorableviolet t1_j5q44ov wrote

I feel like this means more stabbing foot pain for me. haaa

2

Badtakesingeneral t1_j5q4q88 wrote

If WFH completely untethers companies and employees from the same location, I think big name companies are going to increasingly set up their corporate HQs in premier global cities with favorable corporate taxes.

Plus I think they’re likely going to snag a good deal on lease space - Especially if they’re looking to move downtown.

15

SphaeraEstVita t1_j5q6l11 wrote

I get that this sub is mostly just unhappy people complaining but another way of looking at it is that Boston is so great that people are willing to pay a heavy premium to live here.

EDIT: To be clear, I don't mean that you should be happy about things costing more just that it means the opposite of what you seem to think it means. People pay more to live in a desirable place.

14

Chimsley99 t1_j5q9r02 wrote

But then they must pay a premium to the employees. In my mind being 20 min outside the city would mean likely an easier commute but you’re still close to Boston so you’re getting that boon to recruiting. Not like I’m saying they should move to north western MA

−6

THKMass t1_j5qaasv wrote

If they like the city some much why don't they just build their own. They can come here but I can't go into the Lego store at Assembly Row because I do not have a child?! Typical Big Building Block behavior. It's always about Wall Street, never Main Street

−11

Maxpowr9 t1_j5qdfg5 wrote

It's why traveling nurses skyrocketed last year. It's essentially a last ditch effort to keep the hospital open but a lot of the rural ones are drowning in red ink. It's the equivalent of taking out a payday loan to stay afloat.

16

TheAVnerd t1_j5qe97h wrote

Oh man how come there isn’t a “Storrowed” set?

21

man2010 t1_j5qgb60 wrote

It's only an easier commute from the surrounding towns, compared to downtown Boston which offers commuting options from the entire metro. Like, if Lego decided to put their headquarters in Norwood then they're going to struggle to hire someone from Arlington, but putting their headquarters in Boston makes it possible to hire from both.

22

dperry1973 t1_j5qji61 wrote

MIT and Wentworth students are going to go NUTS about it. Once again Boston claims the prize for being a city for nerds and geeks.

108

epiccabbage123 t1_j5qu0a6 wrote

Can they open a lego store in the middle of tge city i dont have a car and cant justify the 2.5 hour train / bus / walk to south shore or somerville :))))

12

Roszo21 t1_j5qvgpr wrote

Most those suburbs are still close to an hour commute from Enfield but the COL difference is huge. You can get a large 3 bed 2 bath home with a big yard in a really good school district for $600k. Good luck finding that within an hour drive of Boston.

5

UltravioletClearance t1_j5qz3fm wrote

I guess I have to wonder, who are they trying to recruit? People with experience either got priced out to the exurbs or moved to the suburbs to raise a family. The only "talent" you have in the Boston metro area is recent college grads and juniors living with multiple roommates while saving up to buy a home along 495.

−4

TheDancingRobot t1_j5qzfft wrote

Folks in Western MA are probably rejoicing that LEGO didn't make the wise decision to put the headquarters in such an awesome area.

Nope, Boston congestion. Wow...poor decision.

−12

veryverycoolfellow t1_j5r014z wrote

Plenty of places within an hour of Boston will give you that.. and actually way better lol. Mansfield, Easton, Arlington… basically any town off the 495 belt. The best western mass towns are mediocre by eastern mass standards, aside from a handful

1

TakenOverByBots t1_j5rdau4 wrote

My parents' 5 br sold for less than 300K last year in a suburb even closer to Enfield. If people really don't care about being in a wealthy district, you can get really inexpensive houses.

8

trimtab28 t1_j5rl13j wrote

>Companies insisting on putting their HQs in the most expensive neighborhoods of the most expensive city in the country then refusing to pay workers enough to live anywhere near the office really grinds my gears.

What a relief Lego is dedicated to its humanitarian mission by moving to Boston instead of Manhattan! Truly looking out for the little guy... er... minifigure!

0

memeintoshplus t1_j5rloxv wrote

Enfield is a pretty mediocre town, but the adjacent towns Longmeadow, East Windsor, and Suffield are pretty nice. Honestly, I'd be willing to move down there, I'd be living a lot more comfortably than I'd be living here in Boston.

6

rfuree11 t1_j5rn6zi wrote

The CT towns /u/spedmunki specified all have school districts that could easily hang with those in the metro Boston area. It's not like CT is renowned for shitty schools or anything. I grew up in the Hartford area and went through a highly ranked school district (actually a rival of Glastonbury). The house prices there are literally 50% of what the same house would cost for me here in Wakefield. Property taxes are slightly higher, but not by much.

8

DoodMonkey t1_j5ry9x9 wrote

Boston is the greatest city on the planet, so it make sense to me.

8

Mumbles76 t1_j5s1peg wrote

Until they see the price, just like GE....

0

werewolfmanjack t1_j5t0zp3 wrote

this is an incredibly disruptive thing to so many peoples lives. The Enfield office has a lot of families, homeowners - and they aren’t big on WFH even though a lot of their jobs are computer based and have zero reason to be in person. Lego is a pretty stingy operation (I’ve heard) when it comes to salary - and they are fine losing a ton of tenured talent and restaffing with more junior folks.

5

free_to_muse t1_j5t6bu5 wrote

Companies will pay what employees will accept and not much more. It confuses me when people get irked that a company isn’t operating primarily as a charity for their workers. The job market is a market and employees get the market rate. When you go buy a company’s product for $50, do you throw in an extra $20 as a donation? Then you shouldn’t be surprised that the employer isn’t doing that for you.

−2

vhalros t1_j5tqdej wrote

Personally, you'd have to pay me a lot more to work in the "outskirts" where I would probably have a substantial drive to work. The quality of life downgrade would be pretty big.

3

vhalros t1_j5tqlfj wrote

Well, its the classic Massachusetts compromise: We can't agree how to improve transportation. But we can always come together and make all modes of transportation awful for every one, with bicycle lanes that just randomly stop and throw you into traffic, subway cars thirty years past their expiration dates, and car swallowing pot holes.

Pick your poison.

8

Hribunos t1_j5tvtlo wrote

I once worked for a tech company that moved from Boston to Framingham. They lost 70% of their engineering staff and it killed the company. A lot of the really desirable staff in the Boston area live in the city and DO NOT want to commute out.

3

Hribunos t1_j5u9jfn wrote

If they want to start moving some design into the US (currently all the design/engineering is in Denmark, right?) it makes sense to open an office in a deep engineering talent pool. But I'm surprised they're closing Enfield, it seems like the lower COL there would be better for less specialized jobs like logistics.

I guess maybe they'll send warehouse logistics down to the factory in VA and move marketing/sales to Boston along with engineering? Our marketing/sales talent pool here is substantial as well, even though it gets less press than the technical staff.

1

SkiingAway t1_j5ui1p1 wrote

Their current HQ is 10 minutes from BDL/Hartford, which has a pretty solid flight schedule/destination map and is the (very distant) #2 airport in New England for passengers.

That said, it's one weakness beyond "not being Boston" may be the issue for a European company - no great way to fly to Europe without a connection that's basically taking you out of the way besides seasonal flights to Ireland.

3

KoenigseggAgera t1_j5ujb6a wrote

Correct me if I’m wrong but the space shuttle was flown by NASA, who at its core is a civilian space agency with no military affiliations, even if they have done work with the military. On the other hand, the USS Constitution is a fully commissioned ship of the United States Navy.

I’m just trying to get the facts together, but yeah, I would really love a USS Constitution build.

4

nukular_iv t1_j5ujudj wrote

The belief that doctors are paid top dollar in Boston is really really wrong. The SUPPLY of doctors in boston is very very high. There is no need to pay top dollar.

They can make more elsewhere. Some in extremely good parts of the country that cost significantly less.

0

donkeyrocket t1_j5uleaq wrote

A better argument would be the pirate sets with tall ships much like the USS Constitution. Not sure why you're under the impression the Space Shuttle was military in any way. Launching military satellites or potentially having active-duty astronauts doesn't make the vehicle military.

I still think they'll avoid it as those old sets aren't a direct reference to any military vessels.

1

donkeyrocket t1_j5umjji wrote

Yeah it sounds like this is LEGO consolidating corporate offices and also a move to reduce the remote workforce. New Boston-based postings for the handful of positions I saw will be in-office three days a week.

Definitely sucks for folks in the CT area that worked there though. The cost of living change will be no joke and I really doubt they'll offer an ample relocation package if at all.

I'd wager this is also a means to tap into engineering/design pools for US-based product development. I think all of that is centralized in Denmark currently.

3

LordConnecticut t1_j5vlacr wrote

That’s my thought, and I think that’s their plan. Lose long standing employees, pay some college grads pennies to live with 5 roommates.

Their location is barely in CT even, it’s more Springfield area then Hartford (if you can split the two), and I think this matters because Hartford is the higher paying market with the nicer suburbs (Federal GS adjustment is the same as Boston). So Lego’s people in Enfield are probably getting paid even less being closer to Springfield.

1

donkeyrocket t1_j5vlq47 wrote

I mean, as your other comment points out, it is still very much an "active" US military vessel.

LEGO often catches flak for the increased presence of weapons in their sets (like the entire Star Wars line) and many argue that is at odds with their ethos of not producing sets that promote violence. I agree that it is sometimes hypocritical. Their defense is the "weapon-like" elements are in fantasy settings and not real-life scenarios that promote violence. Which a military ship (even as a glorified museum) would be counter to.

This is all besides the initial point that the USS Constitution isn't anything like the Space Shuttle in terms of military use. One carried military cargo at times while the other actually engaged in battles.

1

R_Morley t1_j5w37di wrote

No, that's not the point. The point is the Commonwealth is the greatest place on earth. They should be green with envy! As Lego has shown us--there is only one city in new england worth a damn, and that's the City on a Hill. Sicut patribus sit deus nobis !

3

R_Morley t1_j5wy799 wrote

I have traveled across this globe (well the civilized parts) and I believe firmly that Boston is the best place in existence. Except, maybe Australia cause they have palm trees but they also have Tuna Casserole, so I still think its a loss.

1

R_Morley t1_j5yq7ei wrote

You may believe that, as is your right in this great commonwealth, but for I, Boston is the most treasured place on earth. I shall sing it from the rooftops, as the great Eddie Murphy once did on his trip to America!

As I said however, I’ve only been to other civilized countries, so I’ve never been to France. I hear people like Paris but I am scared of baguettes (inferior to our Boston brown bread!)

4