Recent comments in /f/boston

riski_click t1_j483325 wrote

Lol. Real estate prices in Boston, Somerville, Cambridge, Medford, etc have nothing to do with the schools. Housing is expensive because people want to live in Boston, or at least with subway access to Boston.

Housing in Manhattan and San Francisco are also very expensive, but they're definitely not home to their State's best school systems...

21

Wilforks t1_j47yz7a wrote

The prices are high because there’s a ton of demand for homes around Boston near where people work. School ratings are important for people at very specific points in their lives, and while good schools might make some areas more expensive, the places you’ve listed would be expensive even if no public schools were available .

8

mediaseth t1_j47yl8b wrote

Yes. The answer is all of the above and probably more. How this impacts public schools still remains to be seen a little - give it a few more years. "Gentrifcation" isn't new, but schools are slow to change.

Some urban schools, not just exam schools or magnets, can be excellent though poorly rated due to the inability to properly track students K-12. We're talking about a more mobile population. Some kids move from Eastie to Chelsea and back again while in High School, and those are not the same municipalities. I have personal experience with CHS and students can really thrive there, but scores reflect the transient nature of the population and high percentage of ELL students. Scores aren't everything. Scores don't show how well those students have actually progressed while at CHS. If you really want to know how good "the schools" are, track students who have been in the system K through 12 or at least most of it.

Also, look for turnover. If there's a new principal or superintendent every other year, regardless of what kind of school it is, rule that place out. It has problems.

I live in a gateway city and we are exploring two options right now for kindergarten. 1. Public school. 2. Secular private school. There will be no charters or religiously affiliated schools in our short list.

13

Intelligent_End6019 OP t1_j47xfdl wrote

This is a question in the right direction: I haven't looked carefully, but I don't think spending per student accounts for the difference.

The typical correlation is expensive houses (relative to area) -> affluent parents -> better school performance. This holds true pretty well in most school districts around Boston, but not in a few.

I suppose, as another poster proposed, it is the location bonus that raises the prices, but I'm impressed that a location bonus would be so strong.

Another poster mentioned that some Boston schools are stellar. I know there is a lottery to get in, but I suppose if you have the right connections the lottery isn't so random.

−9

SirDaedra t1_j47ssdu wrote

Charlestown and East Boston are all part of the same district. BPS may not be highly rated as a whole but it does have a couple of the best public schools in the country, if your kid can get into them. Prices are high everywhere though, so unless you are fine with a long commute or don’t work in the city, people are willing to pay $$$.

14