Recent comments in /f/boston

bobby_j_canada t1_j4cjai8 wrote

The fact that people use "good public schools" as code for "public schools with as few poor kids, special needs kids, and English learners as possible" is always telling.

Teaching a bunch of upper-middle class kids from highly-educated, well-resourced, English-native-speaking backgrounds is playing the game on Easy Mode. It's not particularly impressive to get good metrics if that's your student base.

3

mycoplasma79 t1_j4bgakr wrote

I agree. The state publishes MCAS scores by school/grade level, and then by subgroup (low income, non-low income, race, gender, EL status). I can see that my child is scoring way higher than their classroom’s scaled MCAS score. I wonder what the distribution of MCAS scores is, in a given classroom.

https://profiles.doe.mass.edu/mcas/subgroups2.aspx?linkid=25&orgcode=00350020&fycode=2022&orgtypecode=6&

1

fitdude19 t1_j4a4mkl wrote

Somerville is mostly 30s no kids who don't care about the school system and West Medford is mostly upper middle class with young kids that are mostly preschool. Same can be said for East Watertown with new buyers. Often both groups will either move to Belmont, Lexington or Newton for both more space but also better ranked schools - if they can afford it, which for people who bought the past 2 years I doubt so anytime soon unless household income is $400K+.

Personally, I'd do Everett or Brighton 10 times before even considering Somerville. Way too dense, and not in a nice way. Medford was a hidden gem that's discovered and property values there will keep going up for years to come. Malden will absorb the cash from those that are now priced out of Medford but still looking for somewhat similar access to the city although the orange line is a huge bonus for sure

2

GM_Pax t1_j4857rp wrote

On the one hand, I was thinking that maybe despite relatively high revenue, that those towns might be underspending on their public schools.

Or, it's also possible that the money being spent on the schools, however much it is, just is not being spent wisely or effectively.

...

For example, I went to HS in Dracut, and while I was there, the athletic teams got a larger chunk of the school's budget than some entire academic departments.

2

actionindex t1_j484bnq wrote

Somerville and Medford high schools are still ranked in the top 50% of schools in the state by US News, and Massachusetts has the #1 schools in the country.

School districts with socioeconomic diversity will tend to do worse in school rankings compared to school districts where everyone is wealthy, but many people put value on being in a diverse community, even if they could afford to live somewhere less diverse.

And even those with children consider more factors than just the school ranking when deciding where to live.

51

Forsaken-Garlic4818 t1_j483p76 wrote

Buying in Eastie guarantees your child a BPS assignment in Eastie, and the schools here are good to great.

But a lot of people buy for Eastie not for BPS assignment but for quality of life. Airplane noise, especially in Jeffries Point, is basically nonexistent and the neighborhood feeling/vibe is great. Very quiet, peaceful, and family friendly.

6

celticsrondo t1_j483mnd wrote

I’m am administrator at a school. School ratings are directly correlated to socio-economic factors and are usually bullshit. The greatest indicator of academic achievement is high income (resources for tutoring and extracurriculars) parental involvement, and behavioral accountability. As a result, if you have all three your children will be successful in any school district including those you mentioned as well as even poorer districts like Lynn or Lawrence.

35