Recent comments in /f/boston

Master_Dogs t1_j5zn52n wrote

How large is the building you're in? A multi unit building with proper insulation is definitely possible to be that efficient. Proper insulation, plus sharing walls/floors with other units gives you more heat for free/less heat loss to the outside.

Even a modern SFH with good insulation can be pretty cheap to heat if insulation is good and the windows / doors aren't drafty. Most of us just have early 1900s units that weren't updated properly or at all in some cases. Mass Save like programs should really do more to encourage landlords to upgrade.

1

twowrist t1_j5zmtln wrote

I don’t know what it’s like post covid, but there’s the Boston Gender Free Contra Dance. In the past it’s mostly been 30 and up but occasionally 20 somethings.

They’re somewhat strict about precautions because the dancing is energetic, and hence rapid breathing plus there are a few regular seniors who need to play it safe.

5

t_hr t1_j5zle8g wrote

How old are you?

Club Cafe is gay. Queereoke at the Midway is very queer but tends to be a lot of AFAB people. Both pretty young scenes. This Sunday in JP there's a meeting of the Cambridge Men's Group (https://www.meetup.com/cambridgemen/events/289639090/) presumably a bit of an older crowd. There are also a few "OUT at Time Out" events coming up, just search gay men's Boston on meetup and you'll find some stuff.

If you already have good hobbies for meetup groups (frisbee, dog groups, board games, etc) just go to the things you enjoy. Boston is a pretty gay place, usually there will be another gay guy in the group and depending on how good your 'dar is you can just chat them up.

Uninstall grindr. Try Hinge, tends to be a bit more relationship oriented. Bumble could also work. If you're kinky, might even want to give AFF/Fet a try.

7

sihtydaernacuoytihsy t1_j5zi5xg wrote

These are not exclusive, and it's... notable... how highly correlated race and wealth are. It might be that solutions that address one significantly address the other, and I don't think advocating for solutions for one excludes also advocating for solutions to the other. Addressing the cost of housing, the functioning of public transport, and access to affordable childcare and quality public schools address both issues.

6

Master_Dogs t1_j5zehkt wrote

It's even harder to compare than gasoline prices though. Everyone might have a different supplier of gas, or even a different source of fuel. The OP's bill is for natural gas from National Grid from the looks of it, but other folks may have Eversource as their supplier. Some people might not even use natural gas and may get oil heat, and some might not even use gas at all so they'll chime in with their crazy high electric bills but that's even more insane to compare since every town gets a different rate agreement with the power company.

And then to go a step further with your pickup truck vs compact car example, some people may drive vastly differently than others! I may drive my pickup truck at exactly 55mph on the highway, while you're off going 90mph and rolling coal at every stop light in town. My gas tank will go a lot further than yours. Just like my heating bill will be cheaper than yours if I set my heat to 60° F and you set yours to 70° F.

And in addition to all of this, we all have vastly different insulation in our housing units. So even if I have the same pickup truck as you do, my engine might be really poorly maintained and so I'll blow through diesel fuel while you're running on eco mode with a fresh oil change and tires rotated last week.

I've tried to compare heating bills to others and it just brews confusion and frustration. The only comparison worth looking at is year over year changes. Make sure you're using the least energy you can to keep the house as comfortable as you can afford. If it's widely different from year to year maybe call your landlord and ask them to service your heating system, or suck it up, or try to move to a move efficient house/apartment. Really little you can do besides turning your thermostat down as far as you can bare. Easier said than done though.

2

SkiingAway t1_j5zdwnu wrote

Ah, yes, no arguments with anything you've said there, just wasn't sure what obstacle to electrification itself you were seeing.

That said, it may be cheaper to just electrify it rather than deal with a unicorn in terms of equipment if we are at the point of full electrification elsewhere and still can't make a decision on the extensions. I agree it'll likely be one of the last to do anything with.

Being a low-frequency branch doesn't inherently mean it can't be electric - NJT's Gladstone Branch runs a relatively similar operation that way. (mostly single-track, often requires a transfer to a different service to get to where you likely want to go).

1

dyqik t1_j5zc7vy wrote

That's nothing to do with the fact that you use less gas in warm weather than cold weather.

Whatever you or I set our thermostats to, whether or not you or I wear a sweater, we will use less gas if the outside temperature is higher and more if it is colder.

The amount of power to maintain a temperature in a house is proportional to the temperature difference between inside and outside.

1

sihtydaernacuoytihsy t1_j5zbqui wrote

Agreed. Never had a Jewish mayor, but Mike Ross's loss doesn't suggest to me that we have an antisemitism crisis here.

I'm a white dude who voted for Campbell in the primary and Wu in the general, mostly on the basis that Campbell seems to me more likely to use her political capital to help people who need it, and Michelle... doesn't want to make enemies.

But it's hardly like Campbell failed to land on her feet, and I look forward to her work in her new role.

15

Roszo21 t1_j5z6g00 wrote

Can't be electrified may not be the right term... there's a shared track issue where it essentially can't run any faster than 60 minutes no matter what so the goal of electrification is moot for the Needham line and in fact will only become worse as other lines run more frequently. Others have explained it on here better than I can. Essentially the MBTA's only plan for better serving the line is to sunset it; extending the OL from Forest Hills through West Roxbury and extending the D line from Newton through Needham. The OL extension would be expensive but fairly doable; the Green line would be a nightmare and is highly unlikely anytime soon. Needham would rather limited service than no service for some long period of time... they know the legislature allocating huge funds to serve one millionaire town is slim in this climate. And they have the power to cock block West Rox/Roslindale.

Essentially the most likely and least expensive 10 - 15 year solution (which would also serve the greatest number of workers, particularly lower income workers) is expanded rapid bus service through West Roxbury to Roslindale Village and extending the OL one stop to RV. I'm actually surprised elected officials haven't yet begun loudly clamoring for it.

2