Recent comments in /f/consoles
Little-Livesey t1_iwpcc3j wrote
Reply to Older Gen consoles need to lose support for gaming to move forward meaningfully. by Big-Golf4266
I'm not sure how "available" next gen consoles are atm. I managed to get a ps5 3 months after release and that was entirely through luck. Maybe availability isn't helping with dropping pre-gen consoles.
AAA games are stagnant because they don't set trends anymore they merely repeat what worked in the past with a shinier coat/ recycle ideas from indie games that have done well. they're not unique and graphics can only do so much to help a game.
Big-Golf4266 OP t1_iwozjvp wrote
Reply to comment by fanboyhunter in Older Gen consoles need to lose support for gaming to move forward meaningfully. by Big-Golf4266
clearly didn't read what i put properly, my entire perspective was as a pc user.
fanboyhunter t1_iwoyegn wrote
Reply to Older Gen consoles need to lose support for gaming to move forward meaningfully. by Big-Golf4266
just buy a PC
x_0euf t1_iwonju4 wrote
Reply to Trade in XSS and NS for a oculus quest two by PinePlayz
You could sell the consoles and keep the money. What kind of games would you play on the oculus? Would you really use it?
Big-Golf4266 OP t1_iwojvm3 wrote
Reply to comment by barbanonfacitvirum in Older Gen consoles need to lose support for gaming to move forward meaningfully. by Big-Golf4266
this heavily dpeends on what you're considering "supported" as im mainly arguing for a transition of games no longer being released or heavily updated for the current console, which definitely hasnt been the case for 13 years on the xbox 360, the xbox 360's last release was in 2015, and im not suggesting we shut down all of the servers for old gen consoles.
And honestly i think a decade is more than enough support when it comes to releasing new games. when you think back to 2013, the release of the original xbox one and ps4 and think about what games looked like then vs now and then look at the hardware inside those consoles, retiring them seems perfectly fair, releasing content updates for the games currently on the console and supporting servers for another 3-4 year seems perfectly reasonable, i just dont think we should be releasing 90 percent of games that come out to these platforms still.
ofcourse this is just my opinion but i think that gaming is stagnating a little, though this is primarily visible in the triple A scene, i think the major reason we're seeing such messes from the triple A scene and really ONLY the triple A scene is because of the fact that they're trying to optimise their games for so many platforms, indie titles that are largely locked out of the console market are fairing much better and have become my primary source of gaming nowadays because the quality is honestly at such a standard that i dont think i'd consider buying any triple A games and havent for years because they simply release complete buggy messes that also fail to have anything truly desirable and new about them.
and to be fair, anti consumerism is literally the motto of the console world, these are the platforms that throw money at developers to lock their games down to their platform, charge you exorbitant prices to talk to your friends and unlock a lot of functionality out of your games and charge developers money to update their games leading to a practice of games becoming absolutely content barren on consoles on titles like payday and such, in many ways tightening the hardware gap lightens the load on developers and increases the ceiling potential in a way that i think benefits everyone whilst still allowing those who dont wish to upgrade to enjoy the games they own for several years to come simply being realistic and saying "yeah you know what this console simply can't run these games anymore" because honestly even rdr2 a game that came out 4 years ago, looks pretty much unplayable on an original xbox one... a pixelated grainy mess...
barbanonfacitvirum t1_iwogt9l wrote
Reply to Older Gen consoles need to lose support for gaming to move forward meaningfully. by Big-Golf4266
Personally, I disagree. I wholeheartedly believe that the shortening of life cycles in order to render previous generations obsolete sooner and sell more consoles and more software over and over again across different iterations of the same console is a terrible practice and entirely anti-consumer. The PS4 is certainly getting a bit old, but in the grand scheme of things it could still go for at least several more years without its support window being unusual, let alone excessive.
I looked a few things up just to help contextualize this conversation:
NES was supported for 12 years;
Sega Master System was supported for 9 years, or even still currently depending on which region you look at;
TurboGrafx16 was supported for 7 years;
SNES was supported for 13 years;
Sega Genesis was supported for 11 years;
NeoGeo was supported for 14 years;
N64 was supported for 6 years;
GameCube was supported for 6 years;
PlayStation was supported for 12 years;
XBox was supported for 5 years;
PlayStation 2 was supported for 13 years;
XBox360 was supported for 11 years;
Wii was supported for 7 years;
PlayStation 3 was supported for 11 years;
Wii U was supported for 5 years;
Switch is currently at 5 years;
Xbox One is currently at 9 years;
PlayStation 4 is currently at 9 years.
Big-Golf4266 t1_iwod3g3 wrote
for me personally i think a big problem is also resellability, as a pc gamer i will say it sucks not being able to sell games, my friend for example will buy a game second hand for say 20 bucks, play it and beat it in a month or so and then resell it for pretty much the same price he bought it. as someone who has a steam library with hundreds of games ill likely never play again, this would be fantastic.
NG_Gambit t1_iwo4mco wrote
Reply to comment by PinePlayz in Trade in XSS and NS for a oculus quest two by PinePlayz
Maybe sell the Xbox then, I'd keep the switch though because you can use it on the go. It's only when it's gone where you'll find yourself in a situation where it would have been perfect 🤣
PinePlayz OP t1_iwo2mnj wrote
Reply to comment by NG_Gambit in Trade in XSS and NS for a oculus quest two by PinePlayz
I mainly use my pc And I dont use my consoles that much
NG_Gambit t1_iwnxi3f wrote
Reply to Trade in XSS and NS for a oculus quest two by PinePlayz
Nah don't do it, quest is cool, but it's no way near a replacement for a console
[deleted] t1_iwnugtu wrote
Reply to Trade in XSS and NS for a oculus quest two by PinePlayz
[removed]
ieightyfour t1_iwn1cl3 wrote
Reply to WHICH NOMINATE DESERVES GAME OF THE YEAR? by Ani_2894
Elden Ring
MiuIruma473 t1_iwn0q30 wrote
Reply to WHICH NOMINATE DESERVES GAME OF THE YEAR? by Ani_2894
None goat sim 3
Freya_almighty t1_iwmkw6l wrote
Reply to WHICH NOMINATE DESERVES GAME OF THE YEAR? by Ani_2894
Other
St0rm_YT t1_iwmbdbv wrote
Reply to WHICH NOMINATE DESERVES GAME OF THE YEAR? by Ani_2894
I basically didn't play horizon zero dawn because I didn't like the look of it. I didn't even get past young aloy. But from the tiny bit of gameplay I've seen of FW, it looks pretty good. Elden ring takes it for me. I don't know where to go because km stuck on this one part due to its difficulty but I've got about 24-48 hours of playtime and I love it. I'm playing other games at the moment so I can't really find time. But elden ring deserves GOTY. haven't played ragnarok or stray but stray can't be goty anyway since it's an indie game and AAA games outnumber them almost all the time (coughs cyberpunk)
Severn2j t1_iwlxv42 wrote
Reply to WHICH NOMINATE DESERVES GAME OF THE YEAR? by Ani_2894
Should have a placeholder for Calisto Protocol...
darksoulsmaster77898 t1_iwlxa8p wrote
Reply to WHICH NOMINATE DESERVES GAME OF THE YEAR? by Ani_2894
It's hard to decide, since Ellden ring is amazing, (but easy as fuck) gow has a far better story and etc...
OkJob7855 t1_iwlpail wrote
Reply to WHICH NOMINATE DESERVES GAME OF THE YEAR? by Ani_2894
Stray is a fine game, I enjoyed it, but its not GOTY quality imo. Elden Ring, Horizon or maybe GoW (still playing) should win for me
kor0k_hunter t1_iwlef0w wrote
Reply to comment by MahatmaAndhi in WHICH NOMINATE DESERVES GAME OF THE YEAR? by Ani_2894
These are all great games, wdym "a bad year for games"?
Ofdream-Thelema t1_iwlb630 wrote
Reply to WHICH NOMINATE DESERVES GAME OF THE YEAR? by Ani_2894
Elden ring all the fucking way
[deleted] t1_iwkzvf6 wrote
Reply to WHICH NOMINATE DESERVES GAME OF THE YEAR? by Ani_2894
[removed]
MahatmaAndhi t1_iwkvqy7 wrote
Reply to WHICH NOMINATE DESERVES GAME OF THE YEAR? by Ani_2894
It's a really bad year for games if these are the nominees. It's not that any are bad, but two of them are GotW material at best. Given that Elden Ring seems to be a contender for one of the greatest of all time (I didn't like it) then I'd be surprised if this didn't win.
Nezben t1_iwkigww wrote
Reply to WHICH NOMINATE DESERVES GAME OF THE YEAR? by Ani_2894
They all 'deserve' it.
I have not played any of them so i cant comment on what game i think is best.
celcius_451 t1_iwk18cr wrote
Reply to WHICH NOMINATE DESERVES GAME OF THE YEAR? by Ani_2894
I was sure it'd be Elden Ring even though Ragnarök would be the bomb. But now that I'm playing it, man the game never gets dull, whenever you think you got it some new gameplay mechanic or new character is introduced. I'm just in awe. I believe Santa Monica is going for the second goty award this year.
BarryBeanflicker t1_iwpeeze wrote
Reply to Older Gen consoles need to lose support for gaming to move forward meaningfully. by Big-Golf4266
People can't afford the new consoles but they can afford a new game. They're profit maxxing because of relative wage decline and two recessions. It's basically just economics.