creektrout22 t1_iymuyib wrote
Interesting data, but shouldn’t this also be compared to the average birth month pattern in general? That would provide more evidence for the relative age effect. Births are not equal across all months to start with in humans (even simplistically based on days of the moths).
marbel29 t1_iynmh8j wrote
As a economist, was going to say that. This is partly inconclusive data. It’s need to be crossed like you said with average births per month maybe across healthy males between 8-18 years of age and 18-35, to differentiate if this affects only in youth or in adulthood as well
PmMeWifeNudesUCuck t1_iyog3e4 wrote
Exactly and then track the delta and see if it's significant
RJrules64 t1_iyn02iq wrote
This is true and I suspect that would explain the spike in September!
dcolomer10 t1_iynasoz wrote
The September one can be explained because some countries have a September cutoff for academics/sports instead of January. At least, from my experience, UK and US have a September cutoff. In Spain, France, Italy Im sure the cutoff is in January, I’m not sure about the rest.
orlevko t1_iyntfjz wrote
And also, error bars and statistical significance tests would be useful here
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments