Recent comments in /f/dataisbeautiful

Pinkydoodle2 t1_j1bznq9 wrote

That's 100% what the heritage foundation has engineered here but that's not what it actually shows. If you looks at places that vote heavily for Biden but have sensible gun laws like NY, Cali, Mass, Connecticut, etc you'll see that Biden districts are actually less violent than Trump districts in spite of other factors like poverty.

5

milfBlaster69 t1_j1bzapa wrote

Exactly. I went to school in Virginia and in state tuition was $18k and out of state was $32k. Not sure where the extra $18 k comes from but it also says that the average cost of living on/off campus is included in the cost listed. But my rent off campus there in a nice place was $450 a month so still lost there.

47

CablePicker t1_j1bzanp wrote

I think what this view shows is who is driving up the homicide rate in each state. I would say Biden districts are more violent based on this. Trump states are more violent but that is misleading, because it is the Biden districts within driving those numbers. Make sense?

2

verbimat t1_j1by2x7 wrote

I once bought a permit in Colorado to cut a tree in forest service land. a snowstorm picked up as my wife and I were driving out into the mountains. eventually we just pulled over on the road and cut down a good looking tree. a few people stopped and asked if we were ok.

checked GPS data later, and we were on a random backroad miles away from where we were trying to go, and had cut a random tree from someone's backyard. had no idea at the time

3

Pinkydoodle2 t1_j1bwvot wrote

Because counties have essentially no influence over concealed carry licenses.or how easy it is to buy a gun. They also have very little influence over public policy in general.

What you'll see at the state level is that states that enact nra backed policies consistently have not only higher rates of murder with a gun per Capita but also higher murder and suicide rates as a result. Also states that enact things like constitutional carry consistently see a spike in murder rates and gun violence.

This makes Biden districts look more violent but it would be more accurate to say that being poor in a red state is a better indicator.

3

a2_d2 t1_j1bws5s wrote

It’s not. These numbers are not the average cost that Oregon students pay. The two largest schools by students, by far, are UofO and OSU which cost ~13-14k for yearly in state tuition.

The only way it could be this high is if it’s something like the average of all Oregon school rack rates, which is def not the same thing.

3

Downvote_me_dumbass t1_j1bwktm wrote

Where the hell are you getting this data? This is made up, at least for California for public universities.

https://www.calstate.edu/attend/paying-for-college/csu-costs

My alma mater breaks down to:

  • Estimated tuition and fees: $7,806
  • Estimated cost of books and supplies: $1,970
  • Total: $9,776 per year

Even if you did the more expensive University of California, it’s no where near $35k per year.

https://admission.universityofcalifornia.edu/tuition-financial-aid/tuition-cost-of-attendance/

The UC breaks down to:

  • UC tuition: $13,752
  • Campus fees: $1,600
  • Books and supplies: $1,300
  • Total: $16,652 per year.

How are you skewing the stats to be over 3x more then the real costs of education? Food, healthcare, lodging, transportation, and personal life choice fees are not education expenses. Those are costs for just living.

13

z06attack t1_j1bu76d wrote

While i hear what you are saying...It is an expense. If my daughter wanted to go to a top school, she needs to consider room and board. If she wanted to get it from a local community college, she would live at home..... you must provide this cost in calculations. Otherwise you are not being realistic to what it takes to attend that school

0