Recent comments in /f/dataisbeautiful
Soviet_Llama t1_j1gk92o wrote
Reply to comment by Savings-Ad-9713 in [OC] Yeah Science! Scientific Output vs. National Wealth by whatweshouldcallyou
Mo' money, Mo' problems..... that are funded to be researched and published
sillychillly OP t1_j1gjqqu wrote
Reply to comment by JohnCocktoastener in Inequality in annual earnings worsens in 2021: Top 1% of earners get a larger share of the earnings pie while the bottom 90% lose ground by sillychillly
Inflation has outpaced many people working class wages. It’s not just this years inflation, it’s inflation overtime
[deleted] t1_j1gjjc8 wrote
[removed]
SerialStateLineXer t1_j1gi9nr wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in [OC] Yeah Science! Scientific Output vs. National Wealth by whatweshouldcallyou
The range is compressed by use of a log scale. The y axis is ln(papers per million people). Switzerland has five times as many papers per capita as Japan, but on a log scale it's 8.6 vs. 6.9.
Edit: This was in response to a comment expressing surprise that there was very little difference in output among wealthy countries.
fail_whale_fan_mail t1_j1gi9c4 wrote
Reply to comment by BurnerAccountNo2 in [Topic][Open] Open Discussion Thread — Anybody can post a general visualization question or start a fresh discussion! by AutoModerator
Housing affordability is a huge topic, so there's a lot of it there on this. Since, you didn't say what country you're interested in, I'm going to go ahead and assume the U.S., because that's what I know. I imagine many of these sources have correlaries in other countries though.
Many of the variables you listed are available through the U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey (population, income, housing prices, rent burden).
I'm less familiar with it, but FRED Economic Data may be able to give you more information on the interest rate side.
Housing supply and construction can be trickier to get at. A lot of places track new construction but it's often behind a paywall -- and this is often tracked by real estate professionals so there's sometimes some bias built in. The Census Bureau has a report on New Residential construction, but I haven't found it overwhelming accurate when you get down to the smaller geographies. If you have a specific place you're interested in, you may be able to get information on total residential buildings/units from the local assessor's (sometimes auditors) office. Building permits are often used as a proxy for new housing construction, though it often requires some careful cleaning, and may be publicly available from the local gov's building/planning department. A lot of states and municipalities have data portal websites which can usually be found by googling "(place name) open data."
Or if you just want some stats on American housing, Harvard has a commonly cited report: https://www.jchs.harvard.edu/state-nations-housing-2022
Though there's a lot more out there too. Good luck!
sloowhand t1_j1gi0x1 wrote
Reply to [OC] NFL wide receiver Justin Jefferson is on pace to break the single-season receiving yards record by JPAnalyst
As a Bears fan, can I root for Jefferson while still wanting the Vikings, and Cousins specifically, to lose?
JohnCocktoastener t1_j1gh51m wrote
Reply to comment by sillychillly in Inequality in annual earnings worsens in 2021: Top 1% of earners get a larger share of the earnings pie while the bottom 90% lose ground by sillychillly
People aren’t becoming poorer
[deleted] t1_j1gguwa wrote
Reply to comment by JohnGalt123456789 in Compared to your other family members, how would you rate yourself as a gift giver on a scale of 0-100? [OC] by GradientMetrics
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j1gfn95 wrote
sillychillly OP t1_j1gfjec wrote
Reply to comment by Intoxinator in Inequality in annual earnings worsens in 2021: Top 1% of earners get a larger share of the earnings pie while the bottom 90% lose ground by sillychillly
It literally is showing the number of people in each category :) haha
That’s what the percentiles represent
Intoxinator t1_j1gf2b3 wrote
Reply to Inequality in annual earnings worsens in 2021: Top 1% of earners get a larger share of the earnings pie while the bottom 90% lose ground by sillychillly
Something showing the relative numbers of people in each percentile over time would make this more interesting. If there are people moving up overall, that’s a good outcome.
freerangetacos t1_j1gezpg wrote
Reply to comment by sillychillly in Inequality in annual earnings worsens in 2021: Top 1% of earners get a larger share of the earnings pie while the bottom 90% lose ground by sillychillly
"May the odds be ever in your favor!"
basketcase7 t1_j1gewoz wrote
Reply to comment by AlexHanson007 in Compared to your other family members, how would you rate yourself as a gift giver on a scale of 0-100? [OC] by GradientMetrics
> it means that the people responding are overrating themselves
Only if you assume that gift-giving ability is normally distributed. It doesn't have to be...
Logic_rocks t1_j1gaqtw wrote
Reply to Compared to your other family members, how would you rate yourself as a gift giver on a scale of 0-100? [OC] by GradientMetrics
80% of people think they are smarter than the average person.
fred_fotch t1_j1g9zbq wrote
Causation might be going the other way. Places with high GDPs have more money to fund science. Qatar and other oil countries being the prime example.
sillychillly OP t1_j1g9qjn wrote
Reply to comment by DeadNotSleeping86 in Inequality in annual earnings worsens in 2021: Top 1% of earners get a larger share of the earnings pie while the bottom 90% lose ground by sillychillly
The data shows a disproportionate amount of wealth increasing for people the richest among us.
That’s the issue.
It’s fine for everyone’s life to get exponentially better. But it’s not cool when a small percentage of people are becoming obscenely more wealthy while most people become poorer
[deleted] t1_j1g99qp wrote
DeadNotSleeping86 t1_j1g8tj5 wrote
Reply to Inequality in annual earnings worsens in 2021: Top 1% of earners get a larger share of the earnings pie while the bottom 90% lose ground by sillychillly
Important note that wealth is not a zero sum game. There isn't a finite amount of it to go around. It's possible for everyone to get wealthier on average, and the data appears to reflect this.
[deleted] t1_j1g6k49 wrote
GuestCartographer t1_j1g4v7t wrote
Reply to Compared to your other family members, how would you rate yourself as a gift giver on a scale of 0-100? [OC] by GradientMetrics
I am, without question or hesitation, a terrible gift giver.
MaxRoofer t1_j1fy60v wrote
Reply to comment by RadioactiveFruitCup in Compared to your other family members, how would you rate yourself as a gift giver on a scale of 0-100? [OC] by GradientMetrics
When it’s contentious how does it tend to look? Specifically, with how good to you fuck?
Jaysonmcleod t1_j1fvyop wrote
Reply to Compared to your other family members, how would you rate yourself as a gift giver on a scale of 0-100? [OC] by GradientMetrics
In true average of 50 I’d say I’m a 60. In highschool grade score I’d say I’m a 78
[deleted] t1_j1fvshg wrote
[deleted] t1_j1fvpjc wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in [OC] Yeah Science! Scientific Output vs. National Wealth by whatweshouldcallyou
[deleted]
crabmuncher t1_j1gktfo wrote
Reply to comment by martintinnnn in [OC] The cities most (and least likely) to travel elsewhere for Christmas by baronbendigo
Fake London is lovely in the winter. You could go on a walk beside the frozen fake thames river. Or go for a ski on fake Byron mountain.