Recent comments in /f/dataisbeautiful

Sim_Check t1_j1lpeg7 wrote

For other reasons this is happening in Italy too, but always in a decentralized way. Cities like Milan, Boulogne and Rome are becoming very attractive for students and workers, but also very expensive because of the lack of rentals room and houses.

The case of Milan is emblematic, in the mind of many people it became the go-to city if you want to have success (study in a high level university, find a good job with a good salary, have a good career path or run an innovative business). The price to rent an house or a room increases so much that many people live very outside the city center, in places not well connected with the public transportation.

6

navidshrimpo t1_j1lp735 wrote

Between any given day, the amount of murders that happen is going to fluctuate a lot due to the relative rarity of murders. If you average lots of these days, or 365 of them in the case of a year, it converges toward an average.

You can think of each day as a "sample". Lots of days is a larger sample. This convergence is explained by the central limit theorem.

https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_limit_theorem

1

RayTricky t1_j1lktug wrote

The title is blatantly MISLEADING. Its statement cannot be derived from any data shown in the map. The map shows "population density" and only highlights how densely Paris is populated compared to the rest of France. Even for this metric (population density), comparison to Italy is not possible without colorbars. AGAIN: the title is just wrong, the map allows no conclusion over the de-/centralized nature of France and Italy.

−3

ItsACaragor t1_j1liyc2 wrote

As a french person it’s awful if we are honest.

Most of the politic and economic activity happens on Paris meaning that’s where the jobs are too, many people have to go live in Paris to study or work making it an overcrowded and super expensive city.

Extreme centralization is honestly a terrible way to run a country.

I mean I see how it’s kind of efficient to have all the decision centers at the same place but it’s no fun for the average Joe who has to deal with it.

27

1-trofi-1 t1_j1lft4c wrote

A country that was not invaded recently. A country that is actually a collision of 3 different states that even today try to keep their unique identities and show how different they are from the rest.

7

Arthur_Boo_Radley t1_j1l9ydi wrote

> Im guessing here, but maybe they're counting Kosovo as a part of Serbia. That would maybe explain this.

Kosovo [just makes up the difference](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(nominal)). So, they'd be around equal if that was the case.

Here, on the other hand, there's a noticeable difference.

4

inactiveuser247 t1_j1l7q50 wrote

The argument from the freakonomics guy is that in around 96 the generation who were born once abortion was legalised started to become adults. At that time you had a huge reduction in the number of kids being born into situations where they were unwanted/ couldn’t be cared for/ or there were drugs etc involved. With that reduction came a matching reduction in the number of people growing up to be disfunctiknal adults.

Or something like that.

5

FillThisEmptyCup t1_j1l6t39 wrote

It’s more than that.

>When temperatures fall below freezing, cellphones need to be recharged frequently, and electric cars have shorter driving ranges. This is because their lithium-ion batteries’ anodes get sluggish, holding less charge and draining energy quickly.

Though if I were in Norway, I would put in a kerosene heater, since as you mention, it’s a battery drain.

10