I have my children at home while they go to uni and I am encouraging them to not leave until they have a stable income and have saved for their down payment to ensure housing. I really see no need to send them out to the world to struggle when they have a house and we can suppor them as much as we can. We don't ask them to contribute to the house, our priority is that they save as much as possible while they can. The day they decide to leave, hopefully they will do it with resources to provide for themselves. Though it is a cultural thing in large part, in my culture children are not expected to leave the parents house a certain age, so for us is absolutely normal having our children home and hopefully for them the benefits of staying home outweight the social pressure to leave when they are not ready yet.

Hawaii stares angrily

If you read further down you would’ve seen that I conceded there being value to the post. With that being said I don’t regret the way I approached it. My critiques were fair and I stand by them.

And I’m not jealous of anything he has to be proud of. To be frank I’m younger and earn more. I’m simply pointing out that he essentially posted a visualization of his personal privilege, which, again, I have already conceded may be valuable info to some so that they can understand why others have so much more saved than they do.

I wasn’t being hostile, I was genuinely questioning OP’s intent, because it didn’t seem very positive to me. I liked his response though, and we’ve made peace. You can chill

ETA: and about the culture thing—I have absolutely nothing against living with your parents. I wish I could. I have something against earning an above average salary and not contributing. Without an explanation for that it’s an objectively a bad look. I stand by that.

I wonder what that Japan spike can be attributed to

Do you realize the post clearly says "of A millennial" meaning it is specific to only one person not respresentative to a population? In this scenario, the author does not owe any explanations to you about their housing or family situation. Your questioning is hostile. What do you care if their parents are wealthy? Do you go around asking individuals of they are wealthy or how much they contribute to their parents?

It certainly is unfortutante that many people do not have this option, but the post does not seem intended to ilustrate a situation at population level, it is just about one person. Why is it shitty that they made this post? why is it a problem that not everyone has to struggle? are you bitter about every person who is in a better position than you?

I have news for you, in a lot of cultures, including mine, people do not have to leave their parents house, I mean they are not expected to leave, they can stay as long as they want, and we parents encourage our children to stay as long as they can so they can take advantage of having a roof and food while they are trying to build their life. It is not uncommon for people to live with their parents, even while earning a good income, and the reason goes beyond financial reasons, some times is even about company and taking care of your parents if they need that. If you marry you leave, if you don't marry you can leave or you can stay, hell sometimes if you marry you can bring your spouse (this is not ideal, but it happens a lot and no one judges that). People do not have to be wealthy to support their children like this. It is a cultural thing, more than a reflection of wealth, so your questioning is very inappropiate.

[removed]

Does this indicate which states have a lot of species and therefore a lot of endangered species? And also... how could there be such a big difference between Mississippi and Alabama which are right next to each other and have similar geography?

As compared to marine fish, freshwater vs saltwater.

Searching for a country in order to look for the score may help inflate the search index but other data reveals that people truly are interested in reading more about each country. For example, the main Wikipedia article for many participating countries received record visitors during the World Cup.

Source: Google Trends. Tools: Python and Canva

It's interesting you say that, one of the primary architects of the modern metric (Kuznets) had a similar critique, in that no one should use national income metrics as a shorthand for all encompassing prosperity. Totally agree on that point.

I think calling military expenditure a black hole is a little bit reductive. Many of our technological advances were at least partially accomplished by military funding. We probably wouldn't even be having this online thread without the billions of $ the US military put into ARPANET.

Yeah, I agree this chart isn't very useful in image format. The JS-based web version, however, is a lot more useful as you can drag your mouse over every path and the tooltips give you each individual metric.

Ah a fellow ggplotter. Your graph is very nice!

With splitting AND merging, that’s not what this type of chart is used for. This shows me how many purebloods are griffindor, and how many griffindor are alive, but I’m unable to determine how many purebloods are alive.

Well here's a 4th: Move the goal posts

Data:

https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2018/10/29/methodology-23/

Tools: R, ggplot

Guess she was just below the cutoff line of being "Prevalent"

Gotto do that somewhere, since people like Frank Bryce or the muggle prime minister both had a couple minutes of screen time and are not in this graph. How many minutes or how much text makes you prevalent is pretty debatable

This is more of a map of biodiversity than it is poor species management.

Nevada was a climate refuge during the ice age due to its topography. The state is incredibly botanically diverse, as well as having aquatic species isolated by deserts has led to massive speciation.

Gryffindor is green and Slytherin is red. Do you wanna start a war or what?

>Also kinda weird that category exists when unknown exists.

I included this category since there are so many characters that are either pure-blood or half-blood (but definitely nothing else), for example: Peter Pettigrew.

>Why is Unknown/No house between Hufflepuff and Ravenclaw?

No reason, I thought it looked better that way.

Kinda neat I guess. I would personally put "Pure-blood or half-blood" between half and pure-blood. Also kinda weird that category exists when unknown exists.

Also why is Unknown/No house between Hufflepuff and Ravenclaw?

Well, they missed Arabella Figg.

Ah yes, messing with atmosphere. Totally a good idea. I suppose there would be water harvesting companies that would do this? They would probably do it really responsibly :)

Only an American would belive that