Recent comments in /f/dataisbeautiful

petertotheolson t1_j2cut1n wrote

I think your second paragraph is in line with what OP was going for. Doesn’t seem to be anything from them trying to draw a larger connection. Absolutely wild that HK is only operating at 1/6th of its precovid traffic.

OP, it would be interesting to see if any other SE Asian cities became transit hubs in the meantime, or if in general the world is still in the first steps of recovery.

16

brawler839 t1_j2cse54 wrote

These are definitely correlated, but there is probably no common single factor other than COVID-19. Especially considering (I don't think) Indianapolis and Hong Kong have ever had a direct flight connection. So while each data set may be interesting on it's own, or grouped in a larger data set, the two, directly compared, don't really make sense together.

The most interesting thing about this graph, is that a large transportation hub like Hong Kong has basically barely recovered, in comparison to a smaller hub like Indianapolis. However, looking at the data provided before COVID-19, it looks like airport shutdowns in general cause major disruption and there could be a multitude of reasons why a place like Hong Kong may have (and continue to have) lower air travel traffic volumes, especially 2 years after an event like "protests".

13

mimprocesstech t1_j2cq1p8 wrote

From what I know, all are recyclable with caveats, some of which I will mention below. NA doesn't lack the tech, it's more realistically the motivation, there's generally no money in it unless it's sorted, sorting takes money, so very often it is sold to poorer countries or countries like China where it can be sorted relatively cheaply or incinerated as fuel to generate electricity.

Other considerations are things like FDA and others regulations that prevent something that has been to a consumer (all of us) from going back into the production stream for use in medical or food/beverage containers for health/safety reasons. I'm not sure if it's because they fear a virus may survive the manufacturing processes (almost impossible, unless it's purely a clean and reuse type of thing) or because thermal degradation of the regrind material or material mixed with others containing different additives could affect the packaging (far more likely, especially in the case of PolyStyrene [PS] that uses foaming agents often to make Expanded PolyStyrene [EPS]--like foam cups that McDonald's used to have). It's also why mixed material packaging, like ketchup packets with foil liners and milk cartons can't be recycled, the outer carton is paper, but there is a plastic liner inside of it.

10

JesterSooner t1_j2cmn0o wrote

Well, you aren’t paying taxes on it because you haven’t profited off the increase in value yet. The profit occurs when you sell, hence the taxes.

Like if you own a baseball with Babe Ruth’s signature it will go up in value with time, but you won’t actually get any cash from that unless you sell the baseball. Let’s say you were taxed on that increase in value before selling… ok, so you pay the tax even though you haven’t actually gained any money yet. After you pay the tax, you have the ball re-appraised and find out to your surprise that the signature is fake. Suddenly, your ball is worthless and you just paid taxes for money that you never actually had. Stocks work on a similar principle because “value” isn’t the same as “profit”

2