Recent comments in /f/dataisbeautiful

pmocz OP t1_j2eyavn wrote

I fixed the blurriness of my previous post (https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/100141q/oc_improved_growing_interactive_visualization_of/)

​

http://academicsalaries.github.io/
Check out the growing database/visualization at the link above, that is helping promote academic salary transparency.
The visualization uses D3 and the source-code and dataset are free at: https://github.com/academicsalaries/academicsalaries.github.io

3

omegasix321 t1_j2ew93g wrote

Yup, and it's not like all of it just goes into making a shit ton of bombs either. A good third of the budget is just for salaries and maintenance of existing equipment. We could legitimately cut half of the budget and still be the largest, best-maintained, and most modern military on the planet.

The real money waster is bullshit blank cheque contracting(over 400B in 2021) and outright money laundering/theft. There's a reason the pentagon has never passed an audit. Over half of its assets are just straight-up unaccounted for.

The modern U.S. military is a money sink for the corrupt and greedy, and every single politician that votes for yearly budget increases are complicit.

5

pmocz OP t1_j2evq7f wrote

The inflation correction is used to re-adjust submitted salary data all to 2022 values. Most of the data I collected is from 2022, so the effect is small. But there is some data going back to 2010. What is interesting to visualize is: "inflation-corrected salary" vs "year (salary awarded)" and see if pay is keeping up with inflation

1

Til_W t1_j2eqxkc wrote

You said that "missiles are not that effective for defense". If Ukraine is being invaded using e. g. lots of armored vehicles and you claim that missiles are not effective, what should they use instead? You only mentioned your "100 million bullets".

Adressing the current situation on the ground: So what? Infantry needs to be supported by vehicles, artillery and missiles to be properly effective. Zelensky was specifically asking for more Patriot systems (AA missiles!) just a week ago, they need them to shoot down Russian cruise missiles which are targeting Ukrainian infrastructure - yet you claim sending missiles is not effective for defense - huh?

If you're so convinced, please give me a concrete example of what missile that the US is sending to Ukraine is not effective or a waste of money.

^(And I don't think sending 100 million bullets would be worth it instead, Ukraine isn't actually short on mags. What they will need a lot of is AA missiles and artillery munition such as shells or GMLRS missiles.)

3

pk10534 t1_j2endsf wrote

Those aren’t “unintended side effects” they were purposeful research projects. Do you realize how much money and planning and coordination went into projects like ARPANET, in conjunction with universities and the corporate world? To act as though these were accidents as if the DoD just stumbled into making GPS or ARPANET is just incredibly naive, to the point of sounding purposely facetious. You’re just making these claims that have no basis in reality and completely ignore the history of these projects and defense spending because you don’t want to admit that it has resulted in some pretty innovative projects.

8

Hi_its_GOD OP t1_j2emfnt wrote

We are in the US. Our carryout containers are made out of polystyrene. There are alternatives but they are just made out of PP and there are some fibrous alternatives but they tend to be 3x the price while being an inferior quality. If it were up to me I'd switch but running the place with my elder brother so there is more that one person involved when making decisions :(

1

mkaszycki81 t1_j2elwzu wrote

1

pk10534 t1_j2ela2u wrote

It’s bizarre you’d claim defense spending isn’t productive when defense spending in the US alone gave the world GPS, the internet (ARPANET), EpiPens, BugSpray, Duct Tape, Computers via the Army Research Laboratory, Nuclear Energy, Walkie-Talkies, and more.

I would consider quite a few of those inventions to be instrumental in our building of a “better, more capable” society.

7