Recent comments in /f/dataisbeautiful

pale_blue_dots t1_j37klqx wrote

Booo lol .. you can't even say you agree with the basic tenets and foundations of democracy and voting Booo <smh> lol

I already told you, there are numerous examples in Naked, Short, and Greedy and I'll donate $40 to the charity of your choice if you order and prove you have the book - you don't even have you read it. As well, you can find numerous examples searching for "naked short selling."

The fact of the matter is...

You're a true disgrace and are intellectually dishonest and deceptive. Your grandparents would be ashamed of what you've become - and your grandchildren, if they knew the real you, would want nothing to do with you.

Booo go back to whatever grimy shithole you slithered out of.

... you can't even say you agree with the basic tenets and foundations of democracy and voting.

Edit: ... truly, go back to whatever grimy shithole you slithered out of....

... really. Just go away.

1

jasonreid1976 t1_j37iw7c wrote

I think that's in part to the success of Sister Wives. They do paint it in a very positive manner even if it is in the respect of a fundamentalist Mormon family. My wife loves that show. I respect their religious freedom, but it's a shit show for me.

I'm OK with Polygamy as long as all members of the relationship are happy and no one person has say over the others in the relationship.

2

VorianFromDune t1_j377f1j wrote

Keep in mind it’s market cap, it mainly depends of how bullish a population is and the available financial liquidity.

European stock market is somehow much more aligned with the compagnies performances than speculation. Liquidity is also lower, European usually don’t have their retirement invested in stocks.

0

AftyOfTheUK t1_j36ohhr wrote

Just to confirm, after claiming that the issue of phantom shares/votes were a huge issue, and me pointing out that it's not a huge issue and asking you for examples of who has been harmed by this huge issue, I just wanted to confirm for anyone reading that:

you ignored all of my points, and my question, and tried to change the subject to talk about tax revenues - which I pointed out have nothing to do with your original point, and the problem you highlight is one related to proper recording of income, and not to phantom shares.

1