Thanks for that, I had always thought the golden rule came from another source, I was wrong.

[removed]

rowers have very heavy penises. gotcha

That's not adjusted for inflation.

is that it? wow... thought it would be profound. ive smelled farts that provoked more thought

It purports to - see the URL for U.S. inflation in the bottom right corner of the graphic.

Not sure how you would accurately apply U.S. inflation data to worldwide box office numbers...

That list doesn't look to be anywhere near accurate: https://www.boxofficemojo.com/chart/ww_top_lifetime_gross/?area=XWW&ref_=bo_cso_ac

[deleted]

[removed]

Good points except maybe the first - it looks like the chart is male athletes only? Just did a quick search... it's more likely that it's the difference between the unweighted and lightweight rowing (lightweight = weight-limited to 72.5kg for men). You can also see a blip for the coxswain (who tend to be about 55kg).

Thx for the feedback. You are right, this chart could be better without a legend. Thx again :)

Pro tip: the legend detracts from a good graph when it's simple and already labelled.

But interesting graph though. Here's how I'd break it down from my armchair.

• Rowing is about pure raw strength and medium-term endurance. Makes sense that it's the heaviest. The separate bulges are likely men vs women, with a light person being the one that doesn't row but calls the strokes.
• Taekwondo, I'm assuming, has competitive weight classes, explaining the distributions?
• Triathlon people are all wiry, stringy muscle and little body fat so they don't have to carry a lot of personal weight for the many miles/kilometers of the competition.
• Fencing's somewhere in the middle - some fitness, but strength is important.

A violin plot displays the 2012 Olympic male athletes’ weight of the following disciplines: taekwondo, rowing, triathlon, and fencing. The violin plot visualizes the distribution shape and the probability density (athletes’ weight) across each discipline compellingly and intuitively. Link to data, tool used Highcharts, and source topendsport. Check more about the subject in violin plot

A real banger of a verse

Reddit atheists have got to be the most annoying people to inhabit the planet

A planet ain't comparable to a bloody sidewalk.

I do trust there's likely no comedy in the video

Seems the critics hit this sub... Jesus, what's the point of anyone even posting if formatting criticism is all ppl pay attention to? Cmon give the OP some damn credit for putting this together.

If you want to compare the size of their armies or reserve, you could do that without a time series, as a gross number or percentage of population. If you want to compare the development of fertility over time, potentially as a cause of events, as well as being able to compare this development between nations of different population, fertility rates is the way to go.

Yeah! Think about it

I've been needing this. Going from 2020s back to the 90s and what an awesome illustration of how much effort producers now forgo to make a quick buck. This is why so many people loved "Maverick". Remember how at any given time back in the 90's there was almost always a 5 star movie in theaters? ...And even the second and third rates were good most of the time.

Great movies in all these groups but it does pain me to see the progression of quality into quantity. C'mon 2020s, let's get our act together.

[removed]

Imaging have a package so impressive that it’s in the Bible along with how the world was created

Some people are just psychopaths, they just wanna see the world burn.

Dang that's a huge drop (Continues to watch Spider Man:into the spider verse on 123movies)

This video logically defeats itself and forego’s the entire narrative of the Bible that they’re mocking for the sake of repeating the phrase “finely tuned”.

“The universe and most of the planet can’t support life.” then proceeds to show a plant growing out of a crack in the sidewalk…

Also, the vid is called Atheism Comedy, but it had zero humor in it lmao—mockery is just insulting if it’s not funny, not matter how “intellectual” you think the veneer of said mocking is.