Eating at home is much cheaper

I think it's a bit cleaner way of visualizing the data. I'd imagine a pie chart getting cluttered trying to show the same information as shown above.

I also think it just looks cooler lol

And? Obviously they eat out a lot. I doubt they would have saved that much only eating at home.

More than they spent on groceries

This is a nice display. I don’t want to say anything negative about you specifically but I do want to point out something.

Here is a person who puts $10,000 cash into savings in a year in addition to their two retirement funds, who also spends $10,000 per year on going out and going out to eat

Nothing wrong with that at all.

It is just such a great illustration of America that you in that position are the kind of person who just gets $20,000 dropped in their lap tax free but other people are not even getting their food stamps

That's miscellaneous is highly sus my man

Good for you. I like the chart format.

But this is super depressing to me, to be honest. I make about 40k and I guess to be able to afford an average market rate apartment I’m going to need to find a significant other that makes over 100k, or 2-3 other of “me” to be housemates (or polygamists) with.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-19050139

[removed]

Tell me about it lol. It is partially due to us moving to a new city last year and wanting to experience the local fare.

That said though, our goal this year is to cut back 5% on food and allocate that to savings.

Utah is having a pretty decent year too, (something like 170% of normal). In other news, parking at any ski resort is a pain.

Not really TBH. This is two people and food ain't cheap these days.

Is it generally not taxed?

That is quite the eating/drinking out budget!

Source: Me

Tools: SankeyMATIC and Adobe Illustrator

Note: “Food” includes booze (as if that makes $2k/month justifiable somehow 😅)

I have many questions but what do you eat?

We are having epic rain in California and that means epic snowfall in the Sierra Nevada Mountains. I wanted to make an interactive and current snowfall visualization to keep track of the amount of water being stored in the mountains. This is an average of snow water content for all of the 120 snow sensor locations in the Sierra. You can also look at specific regions (Northern, Central and Southern Sierras).

The blue/black lines on the graph (from top to bottom) represent the 100th(max), 90th, 75th, 50th (median), 25th, 10th and 0th (min) percentiles of snow water content for each date from 1970 to 2022. The red line is the current water years value.

In general, the snowpack water content to snow depth is about a 3 to 1 ratio so in the image, the average of 22" of snow water content amounts to about 66" (5ft 6inches or ~1.67 meters). It is much more (maybe 10 to 1) when the snow first falls, but over time it settles and also compacts from the overlying snow to get to this lower number.

Here is the interactive and updated daily (sometime in the west coast morning 8-10am) visualization.

​

Sources and ToolsData is downloaded from the California Data Exchange Center website of the California Department of Water Resources using a python script. The data is processed in javascript and visualized here using HTML, CSS and javascript and the open source Plotly javascript graphing library.

Not necessarily, the boats are rated for certain weight classes so they have different buoyancy

I think the bottom three classes are very visible.

The highest weight class has no upper limit, so I think what we're seeing is genetic differences in muscle gain and people who have been in the sport for different amounts of time as gaining mass takes time.

For example, Tyson weighed in at 212 for his pro-debut at the age of 18. In 2001, when he was 35, his fighting weight was 240.

This is great. I learned something new. Thank you

You're a liar.

It's a DC thing

It's essentially a flow chart. This sub has been overrun by Sankey diagrams as of late.

>It was answered you numbskull.

It wasn't. You haven't given me any examples of people harmed by the things you're claiming is very very serious and very very bad.

>The fact of the matter is your position on democracy and voting is inconsistent with the near entirety of the civilized and educated world

I haven't expressed any position on that. I'm not sure who you've mistaken for me from another comment.

put weight class lines on each?

for rowing...cox and lightweight are obvious.