Recent comments in /f/dataisbeautiful
TROPtastic t1_j45dzf9 wrote
Reply to comment by Revenege in [OC] Uruguay slashed its informal economy by half in just 10 years. by latinometrics
Diving into the Sources in Our World in Data, there's this in a linked PDF:
>Definition: This indicator presents the share of employment which is classified as informal employment in the total economy, and separately in agriculture and in non-agriculture.
>Concepts: Employment comprises all persons of working age who, during a short reference period (one week), were engaged in any activity to produce goods or provide services for pay or profit. Informal employment comprises persons who in their main or secondary jobs were in one of the following categories:
>- Own-account workers, employers and members of producers’ cooperatives employed in their own informal sector enterprises (the characteristics of the enterprise determine the informal nature of their jobs);
- Own-account workers engaged in the production of goods exclusively for own final use by their household (e.g. subsistence farming);
- Contributing family workers, regardless of whether they work in formal or informal sector enterprises (they usually do not have explicit, written contracts of employment, and are not subject to labour legislation, social security regulations, collective agreements, etc., which determines the informal nature of their jobs);
- Employees holding informal jobs, whether employed by formal sector enterprises, informal sector enterprises, or as paid domestic workers by households (employees are considered to have informal jobs if their employment relationship is, in law or in practice, not subject to national labour legislation, income taxation, social protection or entitlement to certain employment benefits). For the purpose of classifying persons into formal or informal employment for this indicator, only the characteristics of the main job are considered. An enterprise belongs to the informal sector if it fulfils the three following conditions:
- It is an unincorporated enterprise (it is not constituted as a legal entity separate from its owners, and it is owned and controlled by one or more members of one or more households, and it is not a quasi- corporation: it does not have a complete set of accounts, including balance sheets);
- It is a market enterprise (it sells at least some of the goods or services it produces);
- The enterprise is not registered or the employees of the enterprise are not registered or the number of persons engaged on a continuous basis is below a threshold determined by the country.
Extreme-Evidence9111 t1_j45d9sn wrote
Reply to [OC] The decline of the Mecha Genre in Anime (More explanations in comments) by The_11th_Guild
did you guys wanna talk about zoids or gurren laggan?
[deleted] t1_j45d2tz wrote
Reply to comment by calguy1955 in South American Forests [OC] by symmy546
[removed]
bad_apiarist t1_j45cik3 wrote
Reply to comment by GranPino in [OC] Germany's gas imports from Russia vs total. Russia went from 35% to 0% vs total 38% global reduction. by hcrx
Agreed. Though I'd also argue that if you could do that, if you had a base of potential customers worth trillions of dollars over a few years.. well you'd increase production and build that infrastructure... starting years ago, whether there's a euro crisis or not. Why leave trillions of dollars on the table? But Russia largely hasn't done that (yeah I am oversimplifying here, Russia has made such efforts to improve base and supply, but faces physical and political obstacles etc. but I think the main point stands).
GranPino t1_j45c6dk wrote
Reply to comment by bad_apiarist in [OC] Germany's gas imports from Russia vs total. Russia went from 35% to 0% vs total 38% global reduction. by hcrx
You could displace other exporters if you butch your prices. However, finding customers is irreleant when you cannot even export it, and it requires many years to build such infraestructure, sometimes decades, and it requires the technological partners from the West.
[deleted] t1_j45a13n wrote
Reply to South American Forests [OC] by symmy546
[removed]
RussianGasoline44 t1_j459lj0 wrote
Reply to comment by calguy1955 in South American Forests [OC] by symmy546
I was thinking the same
Brainsonastick t1_j457197 wrote
Reply to comment by value_bet in How do people across the world spend their time and what does this tell us about living conditions? by kraken_enrager
It’s averaging over a bunch of people who don’t work at all and those who only work part time and those who work full time or even more.
Evolving_Dore t1_j455d20 wrote
Reply to comment by IhateTodds in South American Forests [OC] by symmy546
Jaguars use many more habitats than jungle, including open environments like pampas and desert. They do better nowadays in jungle because they cam hide from humans more easily.
LurkingChessplayer t1_j4532re wrote
Reply to [OC] The U.S. House of Representatives elected the Speaker of the House after 15 ballots. 1859 was the last year to require more than 15 ballots. by JPAnalyst
I don’t understand why people are acting like this reflects poorly on house republicans? Like, they aren’t just blindly following the establishment, and are instead forcing concessions in return for their support. If people like AOC did this she’d be praised as fighting for the progressive wing, not lambasted for her party being disorganized
[deleted] t1_j451l8k wrote
Reply to [OC] 8 response metrics, avg, 3 predictor metrics: AR, LA, NY, NJ - 2020 election by terrykrohe
[removed]
value_bet t1_j450ucb wrote
Reply to comment by PersonalityKoala in How do people across the world spend their time and what does this tell us about living conditions? by kraken_enrager
That I would understand. But the chart has average in the US at just over 4 hours.
aminbae t1_j450lfe wrote
Reply to comment by toasters_are_great in South American Forests [OC] by symmy546
i mean the us got rid of its forests
and still uses wood for housing
too_long_didnt_read5 t1_j44zjjm wrote
Reply to comment by IhateTodds in South American Forests [OC] by symmy546
Historical jaguar range went from south South America to the south of US, it’s insane.
Luemery t1_j44ze3u wrote
Reply to comment by frankIIe in South American Forests [OC] by symmy546
It would, wouldn't it? That's because it had more forest! A lot more actually.
South/southeast Brazil is home to the Mata Atlântica, another absurdly biodiverse biome Brazil used to have. But, being the main point of the conquest added to the high mountains right after the coastline, along other things, most of the forest is gone today.
We lost 85% of the gorgeous forests that marked our south/southest and, unfortunately, are at risk of losing a lot of the north as well. We lost almost 20% in the last 50 years, and are near a tipping point where the Amazon might collapse into a huge savannah.
Even worse, the last 4 years of government were marked by a blatant disregard of the situation and record deforesting. Good news is that prick is out :)
My point being: people need to be held accountable for our forests, and that starts with people thinking we'd look better with more of them.
Big_Migger69 t1_j44z4nq wrote
Reply to comment by jakart3 in [OC] The U.S. House of Representatives elected the Speaker of the House after 15 ballots. 1859 was the last year to require more than 15 ballots. by JPAnalyst
Kevin McCarthy needed 218 votes from the House of Representatives to become the Speaker of the House on round 1 he didn't get enough, so another round of voting occurred a bit later fast forward 14 more rounds and by round 15 he got the votes.
too_long_didnt_read5 t1_j44z22h wrote
Reply to comment by frankIIe in South American Forests [OC] by symmy546
East is a arid region, nearly a desert and south is mostly prairies but there is some endangered pine forest too.
Brazil is the 5th biggest country, there’s plenty of biomes beside rainforests.
The_Federal t1_j44ycm0 wrote
Reply to comment by microwaffles in How do people across the world spend their time and what does this tell us about living conditions? by kraken_enrager
If we ate slower that might help
terrykrohe OP t1_j44xmww wrote
Reply to [OC] 8 response metrics, avg, 3 predictor metrics: AR, LA, NY, NJ - 2020 election by terrykrohe
comments w/r AR, LA, NY, NJ metrics
Purpose
– the "forest": Previous posts (summary post, 14Apr2022) did not identify the individual states. The overall non-random, top/bottom, Rep/Dem differentiation was the point. Curiously, this differentiation persisted within the Rep/Dem state groupings – for example, as Rep states' R:D vote ratio increased, their infant mortality increased and their suicide rates increased (see posts 07Apr, 21Apr)
.– the "trees": This post presents four individual states and their metrics for comparison.
– z-scores are used so that dimensionless comparison can be done
– note: a negative z-score of a negative metric is considered positive
Comparing and Contrasting the four states ...
i) two Dem states and two Rep states: ranking the states, NY and NJ are at the top end and AR and LA are in the bottom end
ii) the z-scores show why: NY and NJ have large (+) values for positive metrics and large (–) values for negative metrics
iii) compare with AR and LA: both AR and LA have large (–) values for (+) metrics; and large (+) values for negative metrics
iv) LA is curious ... being middle-of-the-road for Predictor metrics
v) the AR large (+) evangelical value stands out compared with the NY and NJ large (–) values for the evangelical Predictor metric
vi) NJ is very urban (the most urban state)
vii) the NY and NJ diversity* values are large – no. 3 and no. 2 (HI is no. 1)
viii) contrasting the Rep and Dem states: the suicide, opioid dispensing rate, and incarceration rate differences are remark-able
similar visuals of other states' metric z-scores:
TX, AZ, FL, GA posted 02Jun2022
ND, SD, WA, OR posted 09Jun
AL, MS, CT, RI posted 14Jul
IL, IN, OH, PA posted 08Sep
NH, MA, NE, IA posted 15Sep
KS, MO, ID, MT posted 13Oct
UT, OK, CO, NM posted 10Nov
NC, SC, DE, MD posted 08Dec
Tianxiac t1_j44wn6i wrote
Reply to comment by ZetaZeta in [OC] The decline of the Mecha Genre in Anime (More explanations in comments) by The_11th_Guild
Half of Code Geass was about mecha fights of course it counts as a mecha anime.
terrykrohe OP t1_j44wkbu wrote
Reply to [OC] 8 response metrics, avg, 3 predictor metrics: AR, LA, NY, NJ - 2020 election by terrykrohe
sources:
GDP
https://apps.bea.gov/regional/downloadzip.cfm
state taxes
https://wallethub.com/edu/states-with-highest-lowest-tax-burden/20494
suicide rate
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/sosmap/suicide-mortality/suicide.htm
opioid dispensing rate
https://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/maps/rxstate2019.html
life expectancy https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/sosmap/life_expectancy/life_expectancy.htm
infant mortality https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/sosmap/infant_mortality_rates/infant_mortality.htm
incarceration rate
https://www.sentencingproject.org/the-facts/#map
state+local ed spending https://www.usgovernmentspending.com/compare_state_spending_2019b20a#copypaste
evangelical
https://www.pewforum.org/religious-landscape-study/religious-tradition/evangelical-protestant/
diversity*
– diversity* = Catholic% + Jewish% + Muslim% + Asian%
– Catholic, Jewish, Muslim populations: https://www.pewforum.org/religious-landscape-study/compare/religious-tradition/by/state/
– Asian population: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Asian_Americans
rural-urban
– population density https://www.states101.com/populations
– agriculture income https://data.ers.usda.gov/reports.aspx?ID=17839#P9dd070795569412d9525def18d45bde2_4_185iT0R0x0
method for "rural-urban" metric
– population density and agriculture income data values were converted to "standard scores", aka "z-scores": z-score = (data value – mean)/SD (see Wikipedia, "Standard score")
– the z-scores were added and divided by 2; result = the rural/urban metric z-score
– note1: 'urban' means "increasing population density"; 'rural' means "increasing agriculture income as % of state GDP"
for the 'rural' metric to denote a "rural to urban" value, the z-scores for agriculture income were 'reversed' by multiplying by "–1"before adding to the population density z-scores
– note2: for the 'rural-urban' metric ... a negative z-score indicates a "rural" value; a positive z-score indicates an "urban" value
tool: Mathematica
***************
i) all of the metric values have been converted to z-scores; this allows dimension-less comparison and averaging
ii) the red/blue background indicates the state's Rep/Dem Electoral Vote in 2020
iii) in the calculation of the average, "negative metric" values were multiplied by "–1"
cyberentomology t1_j44w94b wrote
Reply to comment by Kawhi_Leonard_ in South American Forests [OC] by symmy546
Borders are largely irrelevant here, this is not a political map.
cyberentomology t1_j44w5uf wrote
Reply to comment by toasters_are_great in South American Forests [OC] by symmy546
Down there they’re destroying the Amazon to put in cattle pasture.
Here they’re destroying cattle pasture to put in Amazon.
Send_me_cat_photos t1_j44vvx8 wrote
Reply to South American Forests [OC] by symmy546
OP forgot the data in /r/dataisbeautiful...
jhngrc t1_j45g908 wrote
Reply to [OC] How Far the Minimum Wage gets you to Median Income (Top 10 States) by SexyDoorDasherDude
The bar graphs are wildly misleading. Only 15-20% difference in value but the higher bars are 5x longer? Start your x-axes from zero.