Recent comments in /f/dataisbeautiful

roundhousemb t1_j47mzhy wrote

Paris is actually pretty small by area, especially compared to the other cities you listed. Paris is ~100 km² while Mumbai is ~600 km². Paris has a population ~2 mil and Mumbai has a population of about 12 mil so they're very close.

This chart is just weird because it doesn't define "city" and OP just ripped their data straight from the Wikipedia page "List of cities proper by population density" without any real thought or research about the topic. It does feel like a karma grab. But you also shouldn't say it's wrong just because other cities feel like they should be denser.

14

77Gumption77 t1_j47eoiq wrote

Banks aren't tricking anyone- they make it really clear in your statement what your interest rate is. These people are buying things they wouldn't otherwise be able to because they are using credit.

We live in a free society. People should be allowed to make bad decisions. And if one has any interest and an internet connection, all the information he would ever need is a few clicks away.

19

Labor_Zionist t1_j47cen6 wrote

A major part of the space in a city isn't dedicated to residential buildings, but to utilities- roads, parking schools, supermarkets etc etc. Roads is the most major issue with skyscrapers - streets in Manhattan are as wide as highways.

There is also the matter of space between buildings - Skyscrapers usually require some empty space around them, while smaller buildings can be built without any space between them at all (what we call in Israel "Train blocks").

Skyscrapers do allow to cramp more living space overall, yes, but they aren't that much more efficient. Manhattan is still one of the most densely populated places in the world, but cities like Bnei Brak with buildings 4 stories tall can still compete with it, if they house more people per apartment.

1