Recent comments in /f/dataisbeautiful

Longestnamebeaver t1_j5kyy04 wrote

This is very aesthetically pleasing. Good job! The tool you picked for visualization was interesting though. Given that your PhD was in computer science, I assumed you would use either R or Python. And just for ease of use, power BI or tableau would be the popular choices to use as well. I’m curious to know why you picked adobe illustrator. I haven’t used it before but I assume it’s a design tool like photoshop? Is it better than BI products like tableau in some way..? And did you use it a lot in your PHD program (which again would be a big surprise for me if you did)

7

tauwyt t1_j5kxeg7 wrote

According to your site you read at a pace of 81 pages an hour... that's actually absurd, are you actually reading everything or skipping a ton of pages?

14

jacobwlyman t1_j5kwlt6 wrote

So gaining AWS CDK as a skill is still a work-in-progress for me. I use the documentation a lot, along with relying on my former AWS experience to know what I need. If it’s interesting to you, I wrote a blog post on How I Learned AWS which shares my experience with AWS, but not necessarily the CDK.

We use Python and TypeScript already on our team, so changing over to using CDK instead of Terraform was a matter of consolidating our tech stack to have one fewer language to stay up-to-date on.

2

mmmmm_pi t1_j5kw331 wrote

Reply to comment by cremepat in Books I read in 2022 [OC] by cremepat

What's the most books your were reading simultaneously? Seems like several given the overlaps in the visualization. And how many of these were re-reads of something you had read before?

Anyway, this is a lovely and artistic way to display this information.

37

mmmmm_pi t1_j5kvvoz wrote

Reply to comment by PromiseChain in Books I read in 2022 [OC] by cremepat

At first, I thought the long Patternist series started out as general fiction and then became science fiction by the end. The gradients look pretty and I imagine OP tried solid colors, but found things to look too chunky.

8

Robot_Graffiti t1_j5kvoef wrote

Yeah the link is broken, I had to google it.

The age estimates are based on having found a correlation between parental age and different types of mutation. The different "letters" of DNA are chemically different and the various kinds of single-letter swap mutations happen at different rates. They found by looking at present-day babies that babies with old mothers tend, on average, to have different kinds of new mutations to babies with old fathers. They then extrapolated this idea to the database of historical mutations.

How many thousands of years ago each mutation happened was estimated by a different team in a previous paper, also using statistical methods. I don't know the details of that part but I'm guessing if a gene variant is super common and widespread, it's probably old.

This all produces estimated averages for each era - they know they can't actually put an exact age and date on any one mutation, but they don't have to to get a rough average over thousands of mutations for each millennium.

2

FlimsyHuckleberry OP t1_j5kvnnx wrote

I kept a log in almost real-time (e.g., after a meeting or a stint of work, I'd enter in the time).

I agree that my conclusion that working from home was more productive is not as strong as it should be. Because I was timing myself, I tried as hard as I could to stay focused while the stopwatch was running. So aside from meetings and teaching, I don't think my productivity varied minute by minute between WFH and office.

If I had a better way of measuring productivity, then I'd use that. For what it's worth, most of my writing time was at home.

6

santimo87 t1_j5kv908 wrote

While I agree with all of that, some of these race based statistics are super weird (not exactly OP). Also, Hispanic is not a race and for a society that (understandably) pays so much attention to race (and has a big hispanic population) you should have figured out a better way to incorporate hispanic people and their issues to your analyses.

3

FlimsyHuckleberry OP t1_j5kv0ap wrote

Not a dig at all, I myself am a little surprised. I did my PhD in France where PhD in every field (to my knowledge) are funded for three years max. You do have a possibility of adding an extra year, but you have to apply for that and explain to your doctoral school why you aren't going to finish in time.

PhDs in France are more like jobs where you are expected to show up with most of the skills already.

11