Recent comments in /f/dataisbeautiful

bigloser42 t1_j5oub49 wrote

You set the CEOs max pay as a percentage of the average workers salary, with the percentage on a sliding scale where CEOs of companies with more employees get a larger percentage. Cut employees, cut max CEO salary. Set max bonus’s as a percentage of gross company profit. No more bonus for CEOs when the company posts a loss.

5

jethropenistei- t1_j5oszvj wrote

Maybe more run of the mill employees having board seats and being compensated in stock along with cash would improve earnings disparity. CEOs would be less inclined to lay people off to protect the bottom line. Worker/shareholders have more incentive to increase profits, lower costs and to make sure they don’t lay people off.

2

cremepat OP t1_j5or7uh wrote

My thought process: I wanted to color by genre, but I needed to group them into categories to reduce the number of colors. Prob not obvious, but the warm colors are fiction and cool colors are nonfiction. I pulled out the subgenres I read the most of and lumped the rest into broad buckets.

2

unhappymedium2 t1_j5onove wrote

Some questions I did not see answered in the article:

1 Does the average "typical worker pay" include the global workforce?
I imagine all of these companies in the study operate in developing countries and would therefore lower the average worker comp.

2 What is the domestic company payroll budget now vs then? How many employees are on payroll?
The feminist movement has greatly increased the workforce (for better or worse). If company output hasn't matched this offset, overall pay has to go down. This is actually a major driver of household inequality. If 2 jobs now are economically equivalent to 1 to 1.5 in 1978, how can a single-earner or single parent household even dream of keeping up?

2