Recent comments in /f/dataisbeautiful
Potato_Octopi t1_j6201jp wrote
Reply to comment by YachtingChristopher in Energy consumption in the US from 1776-2014 by MCgamingMC
Kind of doubt we'd have great EVs 30 years ago.
fortnitefunnies3 t1_j61x2ca wrote
Reply to comment by eddy_talon in Energy consumption in the US from 1776-2014 by MCgamingMC
I’m a proponent of nuclear power too. I’m just trying to explain the opposition
eddy_talon t1_j61wvjw wrote
Reply to comment by fortnitefunnies3 in Energy consumption in the US from 1776-2014 by MCgamingMC
Nuclear fallout comes from nuclear detonations. Power plants don't have the capacity to make nuclear detonations.
Affectionate-Iron385 t1_j61w8q7 wrote
Reply to [OC] Youtube has over 1 billion hours of videos, we Built an AI Search Engine that can find exact timestamps for anything on Youtube by simonezchen
yes, and the library with the most amount of 💩
Cpt_Fupa t1_j61t03h wrote
Reply to comment by Orbital666 in Chart: 5G Dwarfs All of 4G's Specs by thinkB4WeSpeak
Might be different in the states, but in Canada there’s definitely a pretty noticeable improvement in terms of speed. I can get like 400 to 500 mb/s anywhere downtown or at home. Putting that speed to any practical use is a different story, since my data cap is 15 gigs (I’m paying 60 dollars a month, excluding my phones financing).
KittyBizkit t1_j61svgi wrote
Reply to comment by fortnitefunnies3 in Energy consumption in the US from 1776-2014 by MCgamingMC
This is exactly what I am talking about. People like you vastly overestimate the dangers and probability of them.
ger_my_name t1_j61skee wrote
Reply to [OC] Housing tenure in the UK by age over 20 years. A big increase in young renters and older people owning their homes outright. by Optimal-Credit-1945
I like this animated chart. Well done. My only input would be to maybe see how it changed year-by-year if that data exists instead of the endpoints of the 20-year span.
I_sure_like_data t1_j61sa96 wrote
Gotta love axis title, one of my favorite labels for sure
HungryLikeTheWolf99 t1_j61r5an wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Energy consumption in the US from 1776-2014 by MCgamingMC
Mmmmm no, you're going nuts, bot.
fortnitefunnies3 t1_j61qdj9 wrote
Reply to comment by KittyBizkit in Energy consumption in the US from 1776-2014 by MCgamingMC
Well yeah but nuclear fallout is bad
EspHack t1_j61qchj wrote
if you find the actual kwh usage, we've been stuck since the 70's, cuz nuke bad
computers are all the rage because its the only tech that can improve within the same power budget, we dont have supersonic electric planes powered by lasers, efficiency be dammed, because again, nuke baddd
energy would be so cheap our standard of living would make the current one look like the 1700's, our freaking sidewalks/streets would be heated in winter
KittyBizkit t1_j61qbiw wrote
Reply to comment by fortnitefunnies3 in Energy consumption in the US from 1776-2014 by MCgamingMC
Except when you compare it against coal emissions. Coal kills more people per kilowatt generated by a wide margin.
fortnitefunnies3 t1_j61p04h wrote
Reply to comment by KittyBizkit in Energy consumption in the US from 1776-2014 by MCgamingMC
It’s not that far fetched of a fear
InterPunct t1_j61oxjg wrote
Reply to comment by KittyBizkit in Energy consumption in the US from 1776-2014 by MCgamingMC
>but most people are far more afraid of nuclear.
Godzilla, after all.
LaffertyDaniel99 t1_j61okq9 wrote
Msm rather cover trump in 2023 than Biden’s s storm of a presidency
Putoigituresse t1_j61nqnd wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in [OC] Youtube has over 1 billion hours of videos, we Built an AI Search Engine that can find exact timestamps for anything on Youtube by simonezchen
I’m actually crazy impressed by how low Reddit is on that list. I have a hard time believing library of the congress has more text than all of Reddit, Twitter, youtube, and Wikipedia combined
WhyAreSurgeonsAllMDs t1_j61ncpm wrote
Reply to comment by Cynical_Tripster in [OC] Search interest for "Trump" vs "Biden" (2014-2022) by 1brt
They had a bare majority in the Senate, and needed Manchin and Sinema on board with every bill. They were not getting sweeping rights legislation passed.
st4n13l t1_j61msgp wrote
Reply to comment by HungryLikeTheWolf99 in Energy consumption in the US from 1776-2014 by MCgamingMC
Yeah I wasn't arguing with you. Just pointing it out for others that this isn't some simple solution we've overlooked. Absolutely agree that if it is an option it's better than fossil fuels.
[deleted] t1_j61ms7u wrote
Reply to comment by HungryLikeTheWolf99 in Energy consumption in the US from 1776-2014 by MCgamingMC
[deleted]
Lethlnjektn t1_j61mlm8 wrote
Reply to [OC] Youtube has over 1 billion hours of videos, we Built an AI Search Engine that can find exact timestamps for anything on Youtube by simonezchen
The library of Alexandria sheds a tear because of 999,999,990 terrible hours of "content" on YouTube
HungryLikeTheWolf99 t1_j61m2xa wrote
Reply to comment by st4n13l in Energy consumption in the US from 1776-2014 by MCgamingMC
Yeah, that's what we do. We take standing dead trees, trees that have fallen within the last year, or trees that people are taking out anyway that wouldn't be used for anything.
And I'd never claim it's highly scalable, but if one has the ability, it's a heck of a lot better than just burning nattyG.
KittyBizkit t1_j61lycm wrote
Reply to comment by InterPunct in Energy consumption in the US from 1776-2014 by MCgamingMC
But not political sense. Too many NIMBY folks who are scared of nuclear power because they don’t understand it or overestimate the dangers involved. Coal kills more people every year than nuclear, but most people are far more afraid of nuclear.
st4n13l t1_j61lr1u wrote
Reply to comment by HungryLikeTheWolf99 in Energy consumption in the US from 1776-2014 by MCgamingMC
Unfortunately that's only true if all of the wood comes from trees that fall naturally or felled as part of forest maintenance, and even if that's true on your local scale, it's certainly not scalable.
Yalay t1_j61l3zt wrote
Reply to comment by TheOneCommenter in [OC] Housing tenure in the UK by age over 20 years. A big increase in young renters and older people owning their homes outright. by Optimal-Credit-1945
The UK makes it extremely difficult to build homes. It is probably the most NIMBY country in the world. Landowners have no right to build anything; everything must be approved on a discretionary basis by the local council.
tthrow22 t1_j620blh wrote
Reply to [OC] Housing tenure in the UK by age over 20 years. A big increase in young renters and older people owning their homes outright. by Optimal-Credit-1945
~45% owning a home at 25-29 feels super high. I’m in the US at the higher end of that range with relatively well off friends and very few of them own