The new Pokémon games are complete trash

It also depends on what has been added to OpenStreetMaps. I live in area that is completely black on this map, but ofc there are plenty of backroads around, but nobody to map them / put them into OSM.

Yes. All of those are gravel roads, so even minor paved roads aren't in the picture. I think this pic is also based on satellite images, so no car has visited those.

Even Google Maps doesn't show all gravel roads, but when they do, it looks like this: https://goo.gl/maps/6ehKRyfYjy3jzhX56

,,,,and typical rally speed on that: 100mph or more. I think they're nuts, but exciting? Hell yeah!

(That's near by my summer cottage, not all random place.)

I gave YouTube 9 hours of useful information. I’d say most mechanics, electricians, and similar forms of trade would agree.

Nice axis title, dweeb. Why even post this here?

All of them. It's why they are called zoomers... They are fast and nimble and live for flexible lives. Zoomers won't have roots. Zoomers chose the life of the road, of being deliveroo riders and sofa surfers. Every. Single. One. Of. Them.

I think this map had removed all of the main roads.

Because of the big number bias… wait until you get a couple hundred nuclear reactors and the compounded effects of little accidents and the very long term effects

>but I bought it because it's still Pokémon

Doesn't that also mean that the game's not terrible?

Because Monster Hunter also notoriously had some of the worst reviews for quite a while, without the playerbase giving the slightest shit as the games kept getting better and better, and only recently managed to swing the reviews with Worlds.

In Pokemon's case, there's a lot of stuff that they aren't adding to the game, but they're keeping the formula intact of encountering cute pokemons, capturing them, evolving them, and just having a fluid gameplay of monster catching. If anything, S&S' and Let's Go!'s attempts to shake things up would justify the low ratings.

Now, Scarlet/Violet definitely had their fair share of technical issues, which would imo warrant those bottom spots more than whatever got BD&SP in the dump.

Damn I see my cottage road from here

If the atlantic ocean was a bath it's be the biggest bath in the world

Can your AI Search algo index timestamps for stars and sexacts from a library of 100K+ p0rn videos? DM me if so...

> I'm definitely surprised to see BD&SP, Let's Go, and S&S so low, given how well all of the pokemon games sell.

That's exactly the reason: Pokémon is a massive enough brand to carry even lackluster products. Go on most forums related to the games and you'll commonly hear "yeah the reviews were terrible, but I bought it because it's still Pokémon."

And lots of Americans are still acting like they are not the problem. They are faaar behind most EU countries.

I wonder how much of that is simply culture... Nintendo games will naturally score higher, since they appeal to most people nostalgia (then again, BotW and Odyssey are by far the best game of those series, imo). Then, you have NIS America releasing niche/weird games like Disgaea, Ys, Langrisser, and publishing a bunch of indie games... also, who's PQube?

With that said, I'm definitely surprised to see BD&SP, Let's Go, and S&S so low, given how well all of the pokemon games sell.

Otherwise, more to the point of the graph, those axis are actually terrible. 9.0 -> ~9.7 on one side displaying data from 9.0 to 9.6 makes it look even more disproportionate than it already is. Similarly, 5.5 -> 7.5 for scores ranging 5.6 to 7.4 makes Sonic force look like a complete disaster when it's "only" 4/10 points below the #1.

I feel like making it a continuous range would've helped a lot... something like 3 -> 8 for weakest, and 8->10 for strongest.

If your aunt had balls she’d be your uncle, but she doesn’t so she’s not

It's not scalable as a carbon neutral practice

Very funny that the very first game released for the switch is the best one and no one has topped it, based on reviews

[deleted]

Managed forests aren’t scalable? How tf you think we build houses?

why is there so many random patches of road not connected to anything? if the car went to capture there, why didnt it also capture the way there and/or back?

is it similar to germany where they had to remove large parts of it?

If Reddit were a library, it would be a shitty library.

Doesn't help to make clear if you report the t-value or the p-value of a t-test. If it's the t-value, you would at least need to report the related p-value to judge if the mean difference is statistically significant or not. If it is the p-value depending on the chosen alpha level (commonly .05) and depending on if it's one or two-sided, it's likely not statistically different because the value is too high. And if it's the p-value, you would also not interpret this directly as a probability of there being a difference in the means (at least in a Frequentist framework).

Data Source: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/giovanni60310/nintendo-switch-games-reviews Tool Used: Tableau Public Link to Viz: https://public.tableau.com/app/profile/datawizardry/viz/NintendoSwitchGamesReviewAnalysis/Dashboard1

Your argument is so far off though. I mean at least a YouTube and a library are comparable.

Let me fix that. If Mt Everest was a popsicle, it’d be the largest popsicle in the world. /s