[deleted]

So Pikachu is 100% and out of the charts?

Is it possible there’s not really much of story there? Or at least not enough verified info/identities for journalists to report on?

I’m not trying to discount the story, it’s just this reads a little like some conspiracy claims can sound where the lack of evidence is cited as proof of the conspiracy.

I don’t know how ‘they’ would bury it from the likes of journalists if it was all over Twitter?

Lickytung was the pokemon of Jessie. Before she traded it for Wobbufet.

[removed]

I don't really see any interesting insight other than the fact that in English the letter U always follows a Q. @OP - what should we take from this visualisation?

Why assume what is obvious when we can be purposefully obtuse?

And they’re not allowed to make it an abuse of power/structural issue thing

You still need a scale for this to mean anything. Otherwise it’s just artistic representation of data.

This is meaningless without a y axis label and scale

This is data but unfortunately it’s not beautiful

Have you done this analysis on any other corpora? I’d be super interested to see it on something like the Google Corpus (or a reasonable subset of it). Or BNC, etc

Am I the only one who thinks the colors are, for once, pretty good?

I noticed that from Jan 24-25 the title of the top story changed from Biden Documents to Classified documents. Was this because the subject of the discussion shifted in the media, or was the title changed for another reason. It is still the same "line" of the graph, just renamed.

Did you already edit it? Cause I never got the impression that you were implying this process would lead to realistic names

Don't know why this is getting so much hate. Assuming viewers have read one page of news in the last week, this graph makes it clear what the media is prioritising.

[removed]

[removed]

The worst is that the topics are only at the end. It’d be easer to follow if the stories were listed at the front, too.

Phenomenal calculation. You assume every minute of YouTube contains nonstop speech at the average word rate. Obviously this is false.

Second, in comparing quantity of speech you say nothing about quality. Libraries don’t contain every single book in existence. Most books are trash. YouTube does contain tons of trash.

[removed]

Lmao you really take your cues from Elon's twitter posts eh

TIL this sub is a bunch of prima donnas and cynical assholes. This chart is nice and interesting but definitely has it's flaws. I think the color palette makes it a little difficult to follow backwards and the trump/ desantis / gop/ future I don't quite understand, the other topics don't seem to be combined like that. But man, you don't deserve the hate you're getting.

[deleted]

Well yeah the people who did it got arrested immediately what more is there to report on, especially since the media can't make it a race thing either.