Looks like each big drop is tied with each major conflict Russia was involved in at its borders (Georgia in 2008, Ukraine/Crimea in 2014, and Ukraine/Donbas in 2021). Pretty steep. Interesting to note that recovery to previous levels only happened after the 2008 slump, never after.

Since the required share of votes depends on the number of contesters per seat I arbitrarily choose it to be 5 contester/seat.

Multi-member districts (for green and blue systems) are of a magnitude of 5 and 'Uneven" means they have a different number of voters in a ratio 1:2:3... 19:20 or 1:2:3:4 for multi-member districts.

Also, since the Two-round system and Alternative vote allow 2nd and even 2nd last preferred candidate to win the graph shows an average preference, rather than sheer share of vote.

I installed the app because they kept bugging me with popups asking me to install the app. It was easier to submit than to resist. I use the app when I'm on the go.

Sources:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hare_quota

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Droop_quota

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Block_voting

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plurality_voting

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-round_system

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D%27Hondt_method

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instant-runoff_voting

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_non-transferable_vote

John Jonah Jameson? Dude just wants pictures of Spider-Man.

There’s obviously no correlation.

This is BS (Bad Statistics). This dotplot is very confusing to read. There are basketballs with different sizes, which is a good sign of bias. This should go on r/dataisugly. You’ll get more karma there.

Then it’s unnecessarily complicated.

Here's the original source with an interactive map instead of a screenshot:

https://ourworldindata.org/life-expectancy

Damn, I didn't even know Federer had such a big flat spot. Those must have been some difficult years!

I’m not comparing them.

AR won one slam.

Hard agree on this. He was this close to being an all-time great, except he happened to live in an era of not one, not two, but three all-time greats. If any one of the Big Three aren't around, I think Murray has double-digit grand slams. He lost in 10 semi-final matches, 8 of which were to one of the Big Three (the other two: Wawrinka and Roddick. No freebies anywhere).

Murray winning Wimbledon was one of my favorite tennis moments of my life, and I'm not even British.

Agassi won 8 grand slams. He probably should have had at least 12 if he had taken tennis & fitness more seriously earlier in his career. How many AOs did he leave on the table by not even playing?

It's Andy Murray, and it's not close.

5 grand slam finals lost to Djokovic

3 grand slam finals lost to Federer

8 semi-final losses to Nadal, Djokovic or Federer.

Hey OP I’d love to see this reformatted and reposted. I’m a pharmacist so obviously I think the topic is interesting. I assume the correlation shown here has to do with better access to care overall and more sophisticated institutions. Good luck!

As a pharmacist I can confirm that I directly increase the lifespan of everyone around me.

Revealed being in caps makes me cringe.

No, I meant Andy Roddick.

3 Wimbledon finals losses to Federer, plus one Wimbledon SF loss to Federer.

1 US Open final loss to Federer.

3 Aus Open SF loss to Federer.

To take Djokovic as an example, he has 22 slams and 17 losses to other big 3 players at slams. So I'm guessing maybe 35 slam wins for him if the others didn't exist, and he's nowhere near finished either. Could've been 40.

Murray has 20 losses to the big 3 at slams, almost all of which were in the semis or final, and 3 titles. He also destroyed his body trying to compete with the big 3 and would likely have had a longer career as a top player without them. He would've had a real shot at Sampras' record and being the GOAT if they all didn't exist.

TIL that South Korea is in SE Asia and Vietnam is in the Pacific!

Quite possible.

Or maybe he just gets bored and retires?

Always interesting to wonder to what extent the Big Three pushed each other to improve.

Bjorn Borg had the record for most grand slams in the Open era, at 11. His last Grand Slam was 1981. That record stood for 18 years, until Sampras won his 12th in 1999.

19 years after that, *three* players had passed Sampras.

Kinda feels like that record may stand for a while. The only current players with more than one Slam win: Murray and Wawrinka, and they are zero threat to win another Slam.

One of my favorite stats - after winning his first Slam at Wimbledon in 2003, Federer won 12 of the next 17 slams. He won 13 slams his first five years. Heck the seven slams he won over the last 13 years would be a good career in and of itself!

A fellow Dane. I tip my hat to you

Right sentiment, wrong Andy.

<g>

Seems like federer did all his damage while djokovic was still up and coming

Imagine if he was in any other generation of players, that slope probably wouldn't have leveled off so quickly

Very interesting topic. Unreadable graphic.