Recent comments in /f/dataisbeautiful

IncomeStatementGuy OP t1_j7eyqir wrote

Do you mean the data input to create the diagram?

These are the first lines of the table (numbers are from the official Alphabet income statement)
Search advertising Ad revenue 162.45 148.951
Youtube Ad revenue 29.243 28.845
AdMob, AdSense & other Ad revenue 32.78 31.701
Ad revenue Revenue 224.473 209.497
Playstore and other Revenue 29.055 28.032
Google Cloud Revenue 26.28 19.206
Other revenue Revenue 3.028 0.902
Revenue Gross profit 156.633 146.698
Revenue Cost of revenue 126.203 110.939
Gross profit Operating profit 74.842 78.714
Gross profit Operating expenses 81.791 67.984

1

SeriousSamStone t1_j7exndk wrote

> Perhaps one of the best-kept secrets of payroll taxes is that employees effectively pay almost the entire payroll tax, instead of splitting the burden with their employers.

> This is because tax incidence is not determined by law, but by markets. In fact, the person who is required to pay a tax to the federal government is often different than the person who bears the tax burden. Usually, the marketplace decides how the tax burden is divided between buyers and sellers, based on which party is more sensitive to changes in prices (economists call this “relative price elasticities”).

> It turns out that the supply of labor – that is, workers’ willingness to work – is much less sensitive to taxes than the demand for labor – or employers’ willingness to hire. This is because workers who need a job are not as responsive to changes in wages, but businesses are able to “shop around” for the best workers or shift production to different locations.

> This means that, rather than workers and employers each paying 7.65 percent in payroll taxes, employers send their portion of the tax to the government and then decrease workers’ wages by almost 7.65 percent. Next, workers pay their 7.65 percent share on those wages. In effect, there is hardly such a thing as the “employer-side” payroll tax, because almost the entire burden of the payroll tax is passed on to employees in the form of lower wages.

Source: https://taxfoundation.org/what-are-payroll-taxes-and-who-pays-them/

6

aussie_punmaster t1_j7ex3u0 wrote

I do, do you understand English? Because I’m not sure you do.

What if I’m developing a policy for a discounted medical treatment which is gender specific and will apply to those on incomes below X? I don’t really care why there’s a difference, I just need to know that there’ll be one in the supplies that I’ll need.

I’d wager your great concern is because you’re fixated on the use/conclusion of the data you have in mind.

2

DataMan62 t1_j7ew8gz wrote

Look up the Earth's axis tilt and how it and the earth's revolution around the sun combine to cause the sun to appear to move northward from (Northern) winter solstice to summer solstice and southward from June 20 to Dec 20. I guess I was lucky that Mrs. Collins spent a lot of time on the Earth and the Solar System in 3rd grade.

1

andrewrgross t1_j7eug5j wrote

The main thing I take away is that company-wide layoffs don't seem to be motivated by necessity. It's not like some giant unforeseen event just toppled their primary business model. If a correction was needed, it should be enough to reduce hiring in relevant divisions, or trim 1 or 2 % of those relevant divisions. Slicing off 6% of the entire company because you had a 5% decline in operating profit even with roughly a year's worth of gross profit in reserve is just ruthless and greedy as fuck.

37