How is Harry going to win if Bonnie Raitt already won?

Maybe it is just me but I find Google search engine works not as good as it used too, harder to find what I am looking for. I hope they will re-re-invent it

This ? https://www.appeconomyinsights.com/

I'm glad you drew the line somewhere.

[removed]

The status quo has created massive income inequality, and is rapidly driving the US towards a breaking point as a result. Google's tax rate isn't low because employee comp and R&D, it's low because they spend massive amounts of time and money figuring out how NOT to put money back into the economy. We need to fundamentally change the way we approach corporate taxes in order to return some equality to the people.

Weird take. I'd never heard the song, and I've never heard of the artist, but after listening to it, it sounds standard to the point of being derivative. Weird to single it out for song of the year, also, but I don't get how it could be "worst" when it sounds exactly like 100 other top 40 songs, and there are so many totally grating, unpleasant songs (including some of the other nominations, probably).

You just told on yourself. I never said anything about it being discriminatory.

As I suspected, you’re so worried that someone might conclude it’s discrimination you’re jumping at shadows.

Just looked up that Bonnie Raitt song out of interest, truly beautiful

[removed]

Please make sure to do this graphic for Buffet when released on the 15th.

I guess it wouldn’t be your typical chart since you aren’t showing profit and expenses but where the spending goes to each agency. This gov site has an overview of spending as well as some data tables with details https://fiscaldata.treasury.gov/americas-finance-guide/federal-spending/ Here’s a page focused on revenue sources, it sounds like they base their charts off of the Monthly treasury statements linked at the bottom https://fiscaldata.treasury.gov/americas-finance-guide/government-revenue/

Nope. She just eats in her sleep and I don’t track it at night

That’s mostly true. She does 3 hr intervals the first half of the night and 2 hr intervals the 2nd half. Since I sleep with her she just makes an “uh uh uh” sound at me to communicate that she wants to eat.

Since I breast feed I do all the nighttime feeding for baby and my husband sleeps in the guest room. That works well for us but you’ll have to come up with your own system.

I’ve heard that the Snoo works wonders but it’s $$$

Also, everything changes all the time. The first 2 weeks it seemed like baby wasn’t sleeping at all at night. Then 2 weeks until 4 months she would wake about 3 times a night to eat (but very quickly since I’m right there to help her). Then babies typically hit a sleep regression at 4 months because their sleep cycles change. She’s been waking close to every other hour but it seems to be extending back to longer as long as she’s not sick (she picks up minor colds every other week from day care).

I also hear that bigger babies sleep better! She was born 2 weeks late and weighed about 9 lbs, so that may be why she did so well from the start.

Also, she didn’t move to a 6pm bedtime till about 2.5 months. Newborns don’t go to sleep until 8-11pm usually. I’ve just always followed her lead. She went from a 930pm bedtime to 6pm over night. I thought it was going to be a slow progression to that

Are there other polls you've looked at where Greeks choose the "cranky" (for lack of a better term) option?

OP doesn't have a family; it's a business and this is an ad. As an avid dataisbeautiful follower, this offends me.

As an investor, the actual portfolio offends me even more though. These are a lot of low upside, high downside stocks. Traditional thinking would call this a safe, keep pace with inflation strategy, but I think it's more Russian roulette. Plenty diversified, though, hence why the data isn't beautiful.

Edit: If it were me I'd have organized the assets by some kind of grouping... sector or some kind of selection criteria that implies why it's supposed to be a good portfolio.

Below is a ling to a video of the pig walking lined up with the data

​

https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/10vcyis/oc_pig_on_treadmill_pt_2/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3

Would be interesting. Do you have a good source for the raw data?

Would love to see a broad breakdown of government spending

There’s an interesting chart in the source article (imho) but unfortunately it doesn’t show up in the link preview :)

How is this a relevant data is beautiful post?

First comment was semi in jest. Though these sort of numbers are culturally dependent and not that easy to compare: what people say and how they act don't always align.

The second comment is true (in fact the 2016 numbers were recently posted on mapporn which is what gave me the idea to do this).

Makes perfect sense thank you!

[removed]