[deleted]

That's what I originally thought, but it can't be. Harry Potter, Aquaman, Joker, TDKR, and the Hobbit all grossed more than The Dark Kight.

[removed]

They're not actually combined. The source data lists them separately, OP just put a picture of star wars for Disney.

While the picture shows Star Wars, the source data lists Lucasfilms separately from Disney. I think it's just a poor choice in pictures.

[removed]

The Dark Knight, Skyfall, The Force Awakens, Avengers (Maybe end game?), Titanic, Avatar, LotR Fellowship of the Ring, Inception, Life of Pi.

But this is talking about the company total, not the movie total

​

Completely skipped Jurassic World

Then why does OP consider Star Wars under Disney instead of LucasFilm? Within Disney LucasFilm is as distinct as Marvel Studios so it doesn't make sense to separate one in the chart but not both.

New Line was owned by WB in 2000 too

Okay, but Disney owns Fox and Marvel. So, this is just absolutely wrong.

X-Men from 2000 is included in the Marvel Studios total which 20th Century Fox owned the movie rights too. It's also credited to 20th Century Fox so you have double counting in the totals.

Disney, Marvel and 21CFox should be one, Warner Bros and New Line should be under Time Warner, Columbia should be under Sony. Then we have legendary and Ratpac, who collaborate on and fund a bunch of WB pictures. This chart is just inaccurate in total

I get thats a Batman movie, a Bond Movie, Star Wars and some sort of Avengers movie.

Would you mind including the names?

There are tons of marvel, SW, Bond movies...

Even if that’s what’s happening, OP’s graph is still disingenuous then. I mean, the representative picture for Disney is a Lucasfilm movie, a separate studio owned by Disney. It also appears that the Disney bar includes Pixar profits, which is also a separate studio owned by Disney.

So why include some under the parent but not others? What is the criteria? It’s a poor choice of data display.

Haven't listened yet. Hmm.

Not Fox broadcast channels or Fox News. The only US TV channels they picked up were FX and Nat Geo plus the 20th Century movie productions.

"Among other key assets, the acquisition included the 20th Century Fox film and television studios, U.S. cable/satellite channels such as FX, Fox Networks Group, a 73% stake in National Geographic Partners, Indian television broadcaster Star India, and a 30% stake in Hulu. Immediately preceding the acquisition. The remaining, not acquired, assets of 21st Century Fox, the Fox Broadcasting Company, Fox Television Stations, Fox News Channel, Fox Business, Fox Sports 1 and 2, Fox Deportes, and the Big Ten Network as well as the 67%-owned Credible Labs, spun off into the newly formed Fox Corporation. Other 21st Century Fox assets such as the Fox Sports Networks and Sky were divested and sold off to third parties such as Comcast, Sinclair Broadcast Group and Yankee Global Enterprises."

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acquisition_of_21st_Century_Fox_by_Disney

The bought everything except the news part of the fox empire.

The same Fox as Fox News? Or only the movie buisness, 21st century fox?

If you click through you can see what they're including

I have no interest in arguing about whether these should be included.

They count Lucasfilm under Disney, Fox and Marvel should be included.

Yeah if they count LF under Disney, they should add Marvel and Fox too, putting Disney far beyond WB.

Same goes for New Line Cinema, being Warner their Parent company

Wb also owns new line, and I think there are more consolidations.

First I thought that Disney made less revenue than I expected. Then I saw that you split it up into Disney and Marvel.

Was there a reason for that? If Marvel is listed separately, then Lucasfilm should be listed separately, too.

I imagine this result is reflected by the population surveyed... If 10% is say Muslim, and that 10% is a part of the poll, it would reflect on having a lower negative opinion of itself...