When Disney acquired Fox a few years ago, it became pretty clear Disney would be getting about 1/3 of all the revenue that goes to the box office. pretty insane.

Oh. Those are /people/ at the bottom.

Very interesting…

[removed]

>corporations pay income tax equivalent to all of their employees' income tax

This is wrong or badly phrased.

They pay payroll taxes, so however much you pay in fica on your paystub, not the whole income tax.

Pretty looking thing. Do the different colors mean anything?

https://a.webull.com/3xbO6WwSrIO5iz2RdP

Ironically, “RATPAC”, not Disney.

>Disney, Marvel and 21CFox

20 century fox should be different, as it was a different entity not too long ago.

Now.. which ones are owned by Jewish people....

Titanic, Avatar, and Inception are the only original movies on this list. The rest are sequels, franchises, or reboots. Can’t wait for the marvel/superhero shit to die and we can get back to actual original stories without franchising the fuck out of everything

Why did you separate Disney, Marvel and Fox?

If I remember correctly, News Corp (Fox's parent company) spun off the entertainment division into its own company which is what Disney later purchased.

I don't really understand why Disney is split up like this... marvel and 20th century are also Disney now, you could argue its split by franchise but then the image in the Disney bar graph shows star wars, so why is Lucasfilm included in this? does that include Pixar too? their own animation studios? why not just have Disney, and everything they own, then also have marvel or 20th century separately to illustrate how large Disney is and how it's distribution is split amongst different IP's?

The Life of Pi seems thrown in there as subversive marketing for the new Life of Pi play coming out (/s?)

Cane here to say this. Disney is definitely at the top.

But there are pictures of different movies in the bars on the chart and that's beautiful and also there are people watching it like a movie and a marquis so its beautiful truly the most beautiful of data

Data data on the wall who's the fairest of them all?

Welcome to the modern internet, where people will make blatant and intentional errors, just because you get more traction by people coming to correct you.

The marvel bar is higher than the Disney bar.

They couldn’t buy the FOX broadcast channels because they owned ABC. (Barred from owning two networks)

Murdoch wanted to keep FOX News (it was the part that wasn’t for sale)

They didn’t want/need FOX Sports because they already owned ESPN. (I don’t think they were barred from buying it, and I don’t think it was not for sale, they just weren’t interested?)

(Not disagreeing, just clarifying)

[OC] audio collected through a smartphone cough monitoring application. Audio to visual scalogram generated in R (wavelet transform), decomposing the signal into frequencies. Purple background allows to see where the explosive peak of a cough sound happens, with the vocal phase of a cough following as trailing bright spots.

[removed]

Always has been.

I mean, is it inconsistent, or is it just a judgment call? I imagine dude was trying to thread the needle between a consistent methodology and interesting, digestible data. He could treat every subsidiary individually, but then you could have a highly fragmented list of players. He could have kept it top-level, but then you end up missing out on individual data for key entities. He probably split the difference to make it interesting to his audience while still providing relevant data.

This isn't a scientific study. It's a post on a sub about attractive presentations of data. I think OP succeeded.

Op doesn’t know the difference between distributor, production companies. Also why are random franchises being split out?