That's interesting. I watch a reasonable amount of Netflix but I've never heard of this movie

Good for Lebron! What’s crazy too is Kareem only made one 3 pointer in his career and still held it for so long.

That’s … sad.

It wasn’t a terrible completely unwatchable movie, but your best?

[removed]

They had to rewatch it to confirm “is it really that bad?”

Data from ESPN: www.espn.com/nba/history/leaders

I created the chart using Plotset.com. You can access the chart itself here: https://plotset.com/share/b475d960-7a07-45a8-9d97-9107cb349745

Source

Newsletter

Tools: Tableau, Figma

Most of thoes billions goes to paying people. You're only happy if it's 100%?

Thats not just a lucky investment, they've pumped an unimaginable amount of money and effort building it to what it is today.

And then there is Fukushima - graph choice not withstanding the Japanese ending their enthusiasm with nuclear is **very** understandable, especially given that the Sendai earthquake and it's immediate aftershocks didn't practically stop for months afterwards... That other countries will take a decade or two to come around on Gen5 type reactors or perhaps Gen 6 or just get real on funding fusion is the way of things.

Oh totally. I could have expressed that with much details and less broad statements. Was just a bit tired when I wrote it.

For starters, this can be an efficient way to set up voice activation. Sound signals are generally temporally compact, and somewhat sparse in Mexican hat basis.

Looks like a big dick and balls

I guess I'm presumed to recognize all these flags, but I don't.

>DataIsBeautiful is for visualizations that effectively convey information. Aesthetics are an important part of information visualization, but pretty pictures are not the sole aim of this subreddit.

Meanwhile in r/dataisbeautiful : a random scalogram of a cough audio recording with no title, no axes labels, no color bar, big ass empty margins and zero annotations or description what so ever gets hundreds of upvotes ...

Ooh pretty colors. Doesn't mean anything since nothing is labeled, but I suppose you could try to sell it to a modern art museum

As a 20 year old I disagree with this. Any publicity is good publicity anyway

Yea. Is this all work-available people or only among people currently working?

[deleted]

What about people only working 1 job?

[removed]

You're correct that the government says that. Weirdly enough the data does too.

very cool!

You wouldn't say it on the basis of these data, but unemployment is down: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/UNRATE

What is your goal in processing? I used to do a lot of image processing with wavelets, so curious on how much is applicable knowledge here. In images, edge/feature detection and smoothing are some of the main goals.