Recent comments in /f/dataisbeautiful

roadtotahoe t1_j8p2ek7 wrote

Yep I unsubbed from that one and mademesmile because the vast majority of the stories are actually terrible and symptoms of a corrupt society.

4

PhoneQuomo t1_j8oyrfc wrote

So much negativity on social media..its really brought me down the past week. Evil billionaires are gonna love forever soon, automation is gonna make majority of people unemployable and said evil billionaires will just take everything for themselves like they have been for all of history. People are gonna be destitute and hopeless crushed under an immortal wealthy iron fist...and climate change is gonna fuck us on top of all this....canada is barely getting a winter this year...never in my life have I seen anything like this...so where is the hope? Seriously someone help me out here! The future feels completely hopeless...

3

kitkat_tomassi t1_j8oxxn2 wrote

As well as all the advice about curating your subs, I've had a lot of success with some well chosen content filters in my reddit app as well.

There are things that I absolutely do care about, but I'm not in reddit for those things, so while I have my reddit time they can get hidden. My list includes stuff like 'China' since there seemed at the time to be hundreds of posts about Chinese surveillance. 'Net neutrality' was hot for ages - I'm in the UK. Recently I've added 'Bing', 'ai' and 'opengpt'.

Stuff comes off my list too. While there was insane speculation about Lionel Messi changing clubs a few years ago I blocked 'messi'. But that's off the list now.

Also block trolls and particularly toxic users.

Make the space what you want it to be by removing some of the bits you don't want. Unfortunately you can't easily filter out videos of tiktok posts or twitter scree shots.

3

Convergence- t1_j8owjzv wrote

It would be interesting to also record the subreddit of each post, to see if there is any correlation between certain emotions and certain subs.. that way it could be easier to weed out the "negative" subs if you were so inclined.

1

tsunamisurfer t1_j8ot560 wrote

Shouldn't you have a measure of probability to say "no correlation" ? What if you are very certain (i.e. lots and lots of data) that there is a very small, but positive, correlation of 0.06? I've seen correlations of 0.001 that had a 95% confidence interval that did not include 0.

1

kemh t1_j8oomah wrote

For me, it's a mental health issue. I have to "hide my head in the sand" to some extent, otherwise the likelihood increases that I'll finally decide that nothing is worth it anymore.

6