[deleted]

[removed]

Well it is a trade-off of either seeing the big drop and nothing else or seeing the big drop and due to the log level graph also seeing the further advancements clearly.

That's what I was always taught to do to provide a better glimpse of data in statistics and econometrics classes.

I-say show the receipts

This is the best comment

You lose your phone for a few days it's inconvenient but not a big deal.
You can't use a tractor for days to potentially weeks at a time and you can end up losing an entire crop field, that's the type of stuff that can literally lead to bankruptcy.

You don't own a JD tractor but "the vehicle owner receives an implied license for the life of the vehicle to operate the vehicle, subject to any warranty limitations, disclaimers or other contractual limitations in the sales contract or documentation"

https://copyright.gov/1201/2015/comments-032715/class%2021/John_Deere_Class21_1201_2014.pdf

Fair, there's variance, but I don't see what this has to do with outcomes of students.

Utah has high test scores, and low funding. DC the exact opposite.

Yup, and picking the most trendy topic possible, while ironically revealing they know fuck all about it!

Going to echo the above comment. What the fuck is wrong with you.

logarithmic decline

Roughly speaking yeah

Half?

Sure, he played both sides. The silly thing to believe is, he gave $40M to republicans.

This could have been so good. Condenses the info of one of those two minute videos into one image. But lacks a bit of polish

Yeah playing both sides of the government is a really bad idea /s

I think we can assume tonnage directly correlates to value, so much so that the positions of countries would very closely mirror the order above. Of course if you have source for tonnage, why not share it?

And a shitty one too... Same as their veiled ad yesterday, irrelevant data set and infographic masquarading as data...

[removed]

So this graph would divide up the number of members in each party on the committee by how much was donated to them and apply it that way?

Yes. All committees have members of both parties usually with the party in majority running the committees

You believe the guy charges with fraud? Lol.

Come on man. If you paid any attention to this story you know he rarely tells the truth.

This guys mom cofounded a democrat super-PAC.

He was in a polycule.

If you think he gave $41M to republicans. You are high.

Since you’re not adding anything now to the conversation. Ill repeat my reply to the last silly goose who said this.

You believe the guy charges with fraud? Lol.

Come on man. If you paid any attention to this story you know he rarely tells the truth.

This guys mom cofounded a democrat super-PAC.

He was in a polycule.

If you think he gave $41M to republicans. You are high.

Because the image actually makes a separate point of saying "99.59 % in 5 years", which isn't all that interesting as it's almost the same %, 98.92% in just the first year. In a way, it's presenting the data in a way making it less impressive than it is.

This is /r/dataisbeautiful, not r/whateverlooksnice, so critiquing data presentation seems appropriate.

What am I supposed to take from this? I don't see any trend (by eye.) It says R^(2) = 3.6% in the corner, which suggests you added a trend line, but then deleted it because it missed 95.7% of th edata...

Are you really co-CEO when the other one is CEO? 😀

So to what is this improvement attributed to? To hardware or to better AI systems designs?