Recent comments in /f/dataisbeautiful

abzlute t1_iyo6xu6 wrote

Idk which specific sport you're concerned with and if it would be done through school or separately, but if we're going with school grade cutoffs then why not just let the dice fall and if they are near the cutoff then keep them home for an extra year? They would be the oldest in their grade, but only by the same margin that the the otherwise oldest kids are/would be.

2

oren0 t1_iyo66n4 wrote

> I hope it's not too bold of an opinion to say that Citizen Kane isn't an insurmountable pinnacle of movies.

Maybe not, but it's at least a movie a huge number of people have seen and liked, and has been consistently highly rated forever. Versus an obscure one that few have seen and was not highly regarded for decades after its release.

10

ranseaside t1_iyo5l0u wrote

No shade from me. I won’t fault any parents for wanting the best for their child. I had fertility issues so I am just happy I had a kid whenever it happened, I couldn’t plan it like that. Tho I have also seen many kids born later on the h the year who were big and strong (I am a teacher), so many factors go into how a child becomes (genetics, diet)

3

FITnLIT7 t1_iyo511b wrote

I mean it can happen. I wouldn’t necessarily aim for a child to be born in January for this reason. My son now was born in April. And If I could “aim” for a date it would be Feb/March. People can deny it all they want but I’ve seen too many late year baby boys get bullied for being smaller - even if it’s just In the early years of school that shit leaves a lasting negative affect.

7

auricularisposterior t1_iyo08d2 wrote

This visualization makes going through the data a lot more pleasant than just viewing the Wikipedia page. However, I wonder if you tried out including graphics to denote when some movies skip a decade before showing up on the list again (e.g. a dotted line). Or would that add too much clutter to the visualization.

3