Recent comments in /f/dataisbeautiful

corrado33 t1_iyrm080 wrote

Of course you are correct. I'm just saying that the MAIN factor in determining if someone will be good at sports is literally how physically mature/how big they are. (As a kid, "size" is pretty much determined by physical maturity (and to a lesser extent, the things you mentioned).

Some dirt poor, poorly fed kid who is 5'6" (due to maturing quilckly) is still going to destroy a rich, well fed kid who is 4'10" tall in any physical sport.

Genetics and what not will determine the final height of most people, but the speed at which one matures will determine how quickly they get there (and therefore, how much larger they are than their peers when they are young.)

And let's be honest here, MOST children who will be playing sports (in the US) are fed well enough not to affect development.

1

DouweOsinga OP t1_iyrhz17 wrote

That's good feedback. I could slow it down, but I didn't know how much patience typically people have around here. I agree on the projection - the underlying data is all gridded though and reprojecting elevation is quite doable, but reprojecting populations and keeping track of how many people are now involved is non trivial. If you have a suggestion, let me know.

Sure, 500m is not going to happen, but people kept asking me to show what happens at that height.

−8