You couldn't pay me to move to that GOP-led shithole.

[deleted]

It’s horrible don’t move here

Per Capita isn't the right approach, but per household is also the wrong approach. Household size is effected by, well, the number of housing units. A state that has historically suppressed the number of housing units will have higher housing production per household than a state with equivalent population and housing production that historically hasn't suppressed housing units.

Adult population is a better approach

Personally, I'd measure change in housing stock relative relative to change in adult population (completions - demotions) / change in population 18+

there is tons of demand in california.

Well flordia gotta sell all that low laying land lol

All good! :D Tone via text is a bugger sometimes.

Out of curiosity, I wanted to know how many of those permitted units were in multi-unit structures.

So I made a plot

Also, this map bears a striking resemblance to the state population change 2020 map you can find here

https://public.tableau.com/views/PopulationChange2020/Dashboard1?

The states losing population seem to correspond to brown or yellow areas and the states gaining population seem to correspond to the teal and green areas.

We need to legalize affordable housing!

But I thought Texas was supposed to be this grand, wonderful, well-run state! Who wouldn't want to move there, start a family, and freeze to death in the winter?

No need for apologies! My tone doesn't come across online, but the emphasis in my last comment was meant in a playful way, not combative 😅

[removed]

Oh yeah I agree with you, sorry! Was just saying what the data was reflecting and forgot to include that, my bad!

It's definitely odd that they're absent and it's not the case on ff.net at all as just looking at the filter for [Harry P./Hermione G.] shows multiple works with favs on the front page, some of which have thousands of favourites.

ITT: people jumping through hoops to avoid saying that California's NIMBY policies are part of the cause of high housing costs

It would be better as a bar chart and you could have used the bar colors to indicate if the character was male or female. It's not presented in the best way like this.

Notable too that in those places the data seems to skew the opposite way, as in while the number of people per household goes up, the per capita new constructions also goes up, instead of being depressed by the bigger relative denominator.

Ty, i thought matlab

But what about preserving all the open space!!!

^ half sarcasm half not.

I totally agree with you. But some places in Alaska shouldn’t be built on. However, near me, a 334 badly needed units were denied and the land was made conservation land. It’s a freaking defunct oil field!

Python, it's linked in my other comment.

Is it because permits are not issued, or because people can’t afford to build?

The fact AF have rankings for college teams genuinely blows my mind

The number of kids per family doesn't vary that widely. It's the same in most states (~1.9), except it's just a touch higher in the Mormon corridor and slightly lower in the northeast.

Wish Texas cost more so fuckers would quit moving here

Ooo ooo

By County

By County!