Recent comments in /f/dataisbeautiful
[deleted] t1_ize785x wrote
Reply to comment by WannabeEthicalHacker in [OC] Largest IPOs in history by giteam
[deleted]
hcrx OP t1_ize6y0y wrote
Reply to comment by throwit_amita in Change in electricity produced by renewables per continent 2012-2022 [OC] by hcrx
Of course!
The source is Our World in Data, but you can see the underlying spreadsheet and dataset here (and copy it if you want). The definition of the continent also comes from Our World in Data.
[deleted] t1_ize6vjn wrote
Reply to comment by WannabeEthicalHacker in [OC] Largest IPOs in history by giteam
[deleted]
hcrx OP t1_ize6oge wrote
Reply to comment by Tsukikaiyo in Change in electricity produced by renewables per continent 2012-2022 [OC] by hcrx
Percentage points
FatalTragedy t1_ize6lid wrote
Reply to comment by Antrootz in Sex composition of baby names in the USA and England/Wales: 2021 [OC] by pncohen
The labels of the axes tell you the same thing as the description, just more succinctly.
FatalTragedy t1_ize6ju8 wrote
Reply to comment by AdAcrobatic7236 in Sex composition of baby names in the USA and England/Wales: 2021 [OC] by pncohen
I mean it's pretty clear that's how this chart works without that explanation...
Quacksely t1_ize6fzt wrote
Reply to comment by NiceShotMan in Sex composition of baby names in the USA and England/Wales: 2021 [OC] by pncohen
They didn't say top right and bottom left, though, did they?
-Doctor-Nick- t1_ize6ei1 wrote
Reply to comment by EngineeringBulky5363 in Number of 'Geniuses' over time [OC] by hcrx
An idiot can definitely run some of the biggest companies in the world if they have the right people supporting them.
[deleted] t1_ize67pv wrote
Reply to [OC] Largest IPOs in history by giteam
[deleted]
HG_Sheldor t1_ize60b2 wrote
Reply to comment by Show-Me-What-You-Got in [OC] Largest IPOs in history by giteam
Idk it's just not very schwifty
jamesblokeuk t1_ize5zaa wrote
Reply to [OC] Largest IPOs in history by giteam
Not inflation adjusted then?
Tsukikaiyo t1_ize5xna wrote
What does increase (pp) mean? Per person? That doesn't make much sense
Show-Me-What-You-Got t1_ize5upf wrote
Reply to comment by HG_Sheldor in [OC] Largest IPOs in history by giteam
Don’t kink shame the investors
usmcplz t1_ize5jpa wrote
Reply to comment by RutherfordBHays in [OC] Largest IPOs in history by giteam
Yeah that makes sense. I didn't think about the bailout and how that would affect their public listing. I was just thinking about the historic nature of the company in general.
drunkenviking t1_ize5hzw wrote
Reply to comment by usmcplz in [OC] Largest IPOs in history by giteam
They almost went under, were bought by the US government in the recession, the government sorted out their finances, then went public again.
NiceShotMan t1_ize5h8l wrote
Reply to comment by NoNameClever in Sex composition of baby names in the USA and England/Wales: 2021 [OC] by pncohen
Yes this is the most striking conclusion I drew from the graph as well. Essentially,
- Americans are sometimes giving their daughters traditionally male names
- British people are not
- Nobody is giving their sons traditionally female names
formerly-chuck-1234 t1_ize5bbw wrote
Reply to comment by 64sweetsour in [OC] World's most valuable unicorns (data from October, so FTX is still there) by giteam
Can you explain your capitalism comment? Are you saying these companies shouldn’t/wouldn’t exist at all under socialism/communism?
[deleted] t1_ize4ydi wrote
Reply to comment by usmcplz in [OC] Largest IPOs in history by giteam
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ize4t5b wrote
Reply to [OC] Largest IPOs in history by giteam
[removed]
RutherfordBHays t1_ize4srh wrote
Reply to comment by usmcplz in [OC] Largest IPOs in history by giteam
They went bankrupt in the great recession
NiceShotMan t1_ize4iww wrote
Reply to comment by mkaszycki81 in Sex composition of baby names in the USA and England/Wales: 2021 [OC] by pncohen
On the bottom left are all the names for which there is universal consensus in both Britain and USA that they are considered male. This constitutes the majority of male names, such as John, Mark, Anthony, Matthew etc. which is why it’s so concentrated.
Conversely, on the top right are all the names that both Britain and USA universally consider female.
usmcplz t1_ize4hm0 wrote
Reply to comment by truthlesshunter in [OC] Largest IPOs in history by giteam
The fact that gm had an ipo in 2010 also makes no sense to me.
2dotsbracket t1_ize48w8 wrote
Reply to comment by blah9210 in [OC] Largest IPOs in history by giteam
Thanks dad
[deleted] t1_ize4735 wrote
Reply to [OC] Largest IPOs in history by giteam
[deleted]
Splarnst t1_ize7aq8 wrote
Reply to comment by LuwiBaton in Sex composition of baby names in the USA and England/Wales: 2021 [OC] by pncohen
A lot of names are "just words":
Daisy, Rose, Dahlia, Petunia, Sally, Sky, Margarita, Hunter, etc.