[removed]

It's the round of 16, not the tree of sixteen.

If you put the state's latitude in the z-axis, you can probably make a surface plot.

excuses, how many people are actually homeless

USA is just obese

What are the advantages of a radial bracket over a tree?

They haven't lost on penalties. Although they missed one, during the regular time

Edit: why are you downvoting me? Losing on penalties means playing 120 min and then do the penalties shoot out. In fact, Kane missing was 1st penalty England ever missed during the game time (excluding shoot out at the end).

But they wear 4 stars

[removed]

I think we should probably be clear that life expectancy isn’t only tied to healthcare quality or expenses. Car accidents and gun-related homicides, for instance, are major contributors to U.S.’ life expectancy being so low, and those two problems wouldn’t go away with universal healthcare or any change to the health insurance system here. You might see some tangential effects, but it’s not going to change the fact that driving is dangerous and Americans drive a lot more than Cubans or Singaporeans. Mental healthcare under a single payer system might help reduce some homicides, but I can’t imagine that without massive gun control reform we would see homicide rates here fall to numbers we see in Western Europe or Japan.

Long story short, I just don’t think this is inherently the indictment of US healthcare it comes across to be at first glance - and anytime this issue comes up people for some reason think life expectancy is just about actual medical care, and it’s really a lot more broadly-encompassing than that. We need single payer healthcare here, but that alone is not going to solve some of the various issues that help determine a country’s life expectancy.

The US also spends way less dollars on social needs compared to other high-income countries. You can’t really manage your diabetes if you’re homeless or live in a food dessert.

So what I am seeing is Bigfoot flies his spacecraft in California - or do I have this wrong?

Based on the fact that every team that has beaten Australia in the round of 16 has gone on to win it, I'll have to say it's Argentina this time.

The kangaroo and the emu. Two animals incapable of taking a backward step.

In my experience this is true.

Most Canadians see why immigration is a good thing for Canada. It's not to say we don't have issues that some see as relating to immigration, like housing supplies, but in general most people I know agree with the original statement.

Meanwhile Singapore and Japan getting the maximum bang for their buck .

People like to randomly connect data and act like they have are wizards. Data is beautiful, but data used randomly is ugly.

It's about helping people that they don't feel 'deserve' it

Im also a programmer but there is nothing to show whether the next matchups are Croatia-Argentina or Croatia-Morocco

I'm smart, don't you Think 🤔? Well you've earned it Buddy, hi5 to you

i laughed at Russia being in the emerging markets section

I think it came about from NCAA March Madness a couple/few years back, someone on Reddit posted this style of bracket and it took off

[removed]

Well the people who make policy do. The other 99.9% of us hate them.

oil prices started to rise

Good thing we don't have universal health care like other counties. It might checks notes cost less than what we have now...