IEA is notoriously poor in estimating growth in renewable. Not really worth tracking.

[removed]

Source: Pfizer

Newsletter

Tools: Sankey Figma tool

Let’s see if we can find all 4 of us here

[deleted]

So UK has only 1 season whole year? I thought it's just a joke.

The only options are a 20% reduction or returning to the bronze age?

Following the same path of the EU would be more than enough, and probably more than anyone expects or asks from the USA, the EU produces roughly half the tons of Co2 both per Capita and per dollar of value produced compared to the US. And the US is probably richer than the average European country, so the lack of money is probably not the problem.

Right, but he's pointing out that yes, both numbers are peaking, but single fathers are peaking at a ~300% rate.

Assuming population growth rate (and by proxy households) of 1%, seems like slightly more?

Disingenuous coloring, as always. It's for a good reason, but still.

I grew up with a single father after my mother died when I was very young. He got almost none of the benefits that are usually given to single mothers. He wasn't able to take off work to take care of me, the school system wouldn't believe him when he said my mother was unable to sign forms for me until he got annoyed enough and mailed them a copy of her death certificate. People will often assume he is divorced and will act like he's a terrible person for keeping me away from my mother or whatever. I know life isn't easy for single mothers, but there's so many challenges and stigmas that single fathers go through as well. Hopefully as it becomes more common that will get better

It is a pretty conclusive graph. I am wondering if the 11 year scale would be better to align with solar cycles. This will show there is no correlation between cycles and temperatures.

[removed]

Never heard about SAD, just looked into it, I stand corrected indeed. Western diet ? I think diet in most western countries isn't as terrible as in USA, although ofc we eat too much processed sugar. Why are USA so much into SAD btw ? I don't understand the history behind this.

Proportion plot would be better

4353 Increase in Mothers4307 Increase in Fathers

number of single mothers has incrasted slightly more than fathers over the last 31 years.

edit: should have adjusted for pop increase for this to be a useful graph. shows very little otherwise. other than over 30 years not much has changed in the ratio of fathers to mothers.

Perhaps downloading? Some also prefer to pay, instead of trying to get it for free.

Ah...12 YEARS in a row. And here I am trying to understand how can January be warmer than July, staring at the damn chart for 5 mins.

A lot of people freeze to death because of no insulation, a grid that might not be able to keep up with the demand for heating has severe problems, buildings and infrastructure that wasn’t built with the frost line in mind get wrecked by frost heaves?

Err... this chart is showing the increase of single parenthood for fathers. It is also clearly shown that single motherhood remains the vast majority. Maybe we don't want ONLY information about the sad majority and nothing else. It's not a competition who's the bigger victim. Instead you could be happy that more men will know what it's like to raise kids alone and maybe things will actually start to change, like more policies for benefits and availability of cheap birth control.

Sympathy card? You must be watching Lifetime Channel. Really not a lot of sympathy for single moms out there. I was a single mom...I had to be the dad too and work a full time job. It was stressful, near poverty level and lonely. This is the majority.

Uh oh. That's not good. 30 years of higher temperatures.

It’s funny you say that about the most liberal state in the US and the one that collects more taxes than any other state (also the one that spends the most on homeless and social programs).

I'm curious what features you're getting from paid YT music that free doesn't have and/or couldn't be unlocked with AdBlock or YouTube vanced?

> The above figures relate to where they were on census night.

Thanks for clarifying that, I was thinking that heaps of families should be counted twice by the metric above.