If each dot represents a location, it’s the size of Connecticut. Makes it seem like there is far more locations than there really is.

Actually surprised Pizza Hut and dominos are so prevalent. I live in one of the areas with 100% coverage and I can’t remember the last time I saw one

It's so hard to find Wendy's and Pizza Hut it's crazy

My only regret is moving to Oregon is the lack of Dunks.

Apparently there was a grip of them here about 20 years ago because every time I mention it someone says “oh, there’s still one on Main St the next town over.”

No, there fucking isn’t. I’ve followed every lead anyone has ever given me and there isn’t a single Dunks here.

I moved out here 15 years ago and the only Dunks I’ve had since then is in Vegas and The Philippines.

This isn’t surprising since Pfizer is a narrowly focused value added chemical manufacturer (pharma), and J&J is a consolidated heath qnd pharma supplier. Basically J&J has a conglomerate business and Pfizer doesnt.

The title of the data image is awesome.

What, you never go out and buy carbon at your local carbon store ?

How much of the difference was only due to Pfizer's covid vaccine though? 2023 will be a totally different story

I've noticed that most data maps are usually just population maps.

Source

Newsletter

Tools: Figma Sankey

Johnson & Johnson, another pharmaceutical giant, pulled in $1bn more revenue in Q3 than Pfizer, yet they 'only' had a 19% net profit margin compared to Pfizer's 38%

Pfizer chart here

What about Hawaii in Alaska?

But I've never seen 9 of them together. So... that's something.

As a lot of people pointed out this is basically a population map. But since you have the data already, could be useful to work out the deviance for each franchise. For example, if Dominos usually has a restaurant per 500 people, but in Texas it has 1 restaurant per 50 people that is very significant and interesting.

[removed]

yeah so its only for 3 months!!!

People don't want to live in the South Island. This is actually causing problems in terms of NZ's proportional representation system because the law fixes the number of South Island electorates at 16, but it grows so much slower than Auckland that we keep adding new electorates in Auckland (and, possibly, some other places in the North Island). However, the total number of MPs remains fixed, which means that the number of list seats that are apportioned to maintain proportionality is decreasing... which is bad.^1

Now, you're probably really asking "why don't people want to live in the South Island?" but population growth is a snowball... people want to move to places where people live already. A context which is missing here is that Auckland (even allowing for two years of population loss) has more than a third of New Zealand's entire population.

^1 Before the special votes were counted, at the last general election NZ nearly had a proportional representation system that returned a parliament where a party had more than 50% of the seats with less than 50% of the vote. Though I personally think that was more due to all the votes that got thrown out on account of being for parties that won less than 5% of the vote (this figure was historically high).

Nuts? You mean burgers and doughnuts

Can you do one that's not adjusted for inflation?

And people will still say that global warming isn't real.

Pollute less?

[removed]

4% of 9.001, but, yah, sure is low!

Peak r/PeopleLiveInCities content

Fat motherfuckers in da souf

Thank god there aren’t any Dunkin Donuts where I live. Worse shit ever.