What is this, r/Data_with_no_control_and_misleadingly_shortened_y_axes?

Elon's shown himself to be a a weird Q-adjacent redpill troll, but that doesn't excuse OP's misleading data visualization.

No Dunkins in the Pacific Northwest?

Habitable zone

Now do the world ;). It would be a lot of yellow 🤟🏻

No yeah, that rant clearly mark you up as level headed and well adjusted and not a little obsessed with whatever the latest reddit circlejerk is /s

Learning English?

Teslas still dominate the EV market.

Pray for the poor souls on the east coast who don't have Jack in the Box.

[removed]

Is a Taco John what people have to use immediately after eating Taco Bell?

[removed]

[removed]

Never realized Jack in the Box was that regional.

They tend to lose more objects in the middle of the year, a recurring pattern even in 2022 after all the lockdowns messed with it. Perhaps the number of commuters increase with all the tourists visiting in the summer. Then it would be more representative to use such parameter as number of objects lost per passenger, I think. Though I can't imagine the real life application of this data lol.

Spare me your ignorant patronizing - Musk wanted to make Tesla synonymous with himself, and now its fortunes are tied to his. If you don't think a lot of public opinion has soured on him you're not paying attention. His flailing with Twitter has become a national joke, and his actions (reinstating Trump, firing half the staff, tone-deaf statements) have taken away a lot of his luster.

This is not our problem, we will not participate in this. 😉

These really highlight the uniqueness of baseball.

Imagine a football field with squiggly sidelines or 89 yard fields instead of 100.

Or a basketball court where the 3 pt line was significantly further back.

Entire seasons/champions could be different.

You've really gotta earn that Homer in Homer.

[removed]

> I have to think that owning a Tesla is rapidly becoming far less chic

You have to get off reddit a bit more.

I added this as an edit on my previous comment but I’ll paste it here as well

Even if in process R&D is included, their 10-K shows only $802m attributed to “restructuring and acsquisition related costs” for 2021. This was already included in my quoted figure netting $21.98b in net revenue for last year. And Im not seeing it anywhere else on the income statement/balance sheet/or statement of cash flows.

For Q3, as you’ll see in OP’s infographic, in-process R&D adds another $502m for a total of $3.2b in R&D. Way below their net income of $8.6b.

From Wikipedia

A pollutant or novel entity[1] is a substance or energy introduced into the environment that has undesired effects, or adversely affects the usefulness of a resource.

Co2 has the unwanted and negative effect of absorbing infrared emissions of the earth surface, so it is a pollutant. I'm really curious as to why co2 is not a pollutant according to you, because plants use it?

I get what you’re saying, but when you look at the total cost a company spends on R&D, you have to include acquired R&D. A company spending money internally on R&D isn’t really different from a company spending money on a company for its R&D

So less things are lost when they aren’t working. Thanks for the graph.

Imagine going out of your way to piss off liberals when you sell electric cars and solar panels.