Recent comments in /f/dataisbeautiful
Batracho t1_j08mlh0 wrote
Reply to comment by Icantblametheshame in [OC] Cost of Carbon Zero - Historical Look At U.S. Funding of Fusion Energy by Metalytiq
$782 bn according to this at least, but I’m not an expert, I’m sure it all depends on what is included and what’s not.
Jefoid t1_j08mcgs wrote
Not even a billion dollars? For the holy grail of technology? Honestly, I never thought it would succeed, and I’m still skeptical.
thehourglasses t1_j08m834 wrote
Reply to [OC] Over the last decade, Chile has risen to become the world's third-largest producer of cherries, only behind Turkey and the United States. 🍒 by latinometrics
Moreover, it’s pretty fucking wicked to profit from the export of a critical resource like water. And yes, any agricultural exports are effectively exporting water.
Global food exports really need to go away. Local production needs to be the dominant mode.
GrimeOfTheAncients t1_j08m61s wrote
Reply to comment by MyaheeMyastone in [OC] World collective security arrangements for the United States, China, and Russia, with each's share of world GDP. by MST3KTFCCTRT
Good old propaganda cool aid that line....
I bet you're talking about Europe vs the Big Bad Russian Bear right?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_military_expenditures
UK alone is spending more than the Big Bad Bear. France and Germany combined dwarfs the Big Bad Bear's expenditure.
Look at graph 5 of https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/2022/3/pdf/220331-def-exp-2021-en.PDF
It's clear that NATO allies expenditure is disproportionately large compared to the threat it's facing.
carlitospig t1_j08lokd wrote
Reply to comment by larsonsam2 in [OC] Over the last decade, Chile has risen to become the world's third-largest producer of cherries, only behind Turkey and the United States. 🍒 by latinometrics
I didn’t know I needed it until I read that. 🍒
Starkydowns t1_j08lns7 wrote
Reply to [OC] Over the last decade, Chile has risen to become the world's third-largest producer of cherries, only behind Turkey and the United States. 🍒 by latinometrics
Now do a graph for the top 3 chili producers
lungben81 t1_j08lca0 wrote
Reply to comment by SecurelyObscure in [OC] Cost of Carbon Zero - Historical Look At U.S. Funding of Fusion Energy by Metalytiq
We know that fusion power works in the sun and in thermo nuclear bombs. Therefore, I think it is unlikely that it is impossible to make a practical fusion reactor. But it may need to be very large and very precise, requiring large R&D costs.
Dud3ManGuyMan t1_j08l6b6 wrote
Reply to comment by SumerianProgRocker in [OC] Over the last decade, Chile has risen to become the world's third-largest producer of cherries, only behind Turkey and the United States. 🍒 by latinometrics
Watch out for asshole Uzbekistan, they'll sneak right up behind you and pop your rear cherry!
poega t1_j08l1fy wrote
Reply to comment by djc1000 in [OC] Cost of Carbon Zero - Historical Look At U.S. Funding of Fusion Energy by Metalytiq
Yeah sorry OP but your data is not beautiful this time
offbeat_staircase54 t1_j08ialp wrote
Now that government has done the heavy lifting, it's now time for private industry to step forward and take the technology and take credit. As has been done so many times in the past.
larsonsam2 t1_j08htho wrote
Reply to comment by Gilgie in [OC] Over the last decade, Chile has risen to become the world's third-largest producer of cherries, only behind Turkey and the United States. 🍒 by latinometrics
Like a cherry jalapeno jam?!
9eo9raph t1_j08hpim wrote
Reply to Number of Mariah Carey's (daily) listeners on Spotify, 2016-2022 (taken from Spotify for Artists) by ObsidianBass
I demand the same graph for Abba and George Michael.
tamagosan t1_j08hlrh wrote
Fusion will not replace fossil fuels during the lifetime of any human currently living.
Glad-Degree-4270 t1_j08hidp wrote
Reply to comment by theincrediblenick in [OC] World collective security arrangements for the United States, China, and Russia, with each's share of world GDP. by MST3KTFCCTRT
They likely just copied a list of OAS member states or something.
LargeRedLingonberry t1_j08gi5e wrote
Reply to comment by djc1000 in [OC] Cost of Carbon Zero - Historical Look At U.S. Funding of Fusion Energy by Metalytiq
Glad you pointed out the y scale
[deleted] t1_j08ggxo wrote
iLqrd t1_j08gcwn wrote
Reply to Relative Humidity readings from my basement after carrying out remedial works - love that trend [OC] by J3N0991
That's interesting, but it isn't "beautiful" data...
[deleted] t1_j08g8hv wrote
Reply to comment by marti14141 in [OC] Cost of Carbon Zero - Historical Look At U.S. Funding of Fusion Energy by Metalytiq
[removed]
Know_Your_Rites t1_j08g551 wrote
Reply to comment by YoungBumi in Tesla value as it relates to Twitter's purchase [OC] by datawazo
The last couple months are a pretty clear, and pretty dire, deviation from the market.
S&P is down 15% on the year. NDX is down 27%. TSLA is down 50%.
Unlikely-Storage8334 t1_j08fme9 wrote
Reply to comment by SisyphusRocks7 in [OC] geospatial distribution of different fast food chains in the USA (included some of your suggestions from my previous post) by MaverickJW
I've read that the no va story is a myth.
partoftheplan4 t1_j08eq54 wrote
Reply to [OC] World collective security arrangements for the United States, China, and Russia, with each's share of world GDP. by MST3KTFCCTRT
I think USA needs to be kinder to Mexico because we may need their help someday.
SecurelyObscure t1_j08eogk wrote
Reply to comment by lungben81 in [OC] Cost of Carbon Zero - Historical Look At U.S. Funding of Fusion Energy by Metalytiq
Well yeah, there's no uncertainty in whether or not you'll get an energy source after extracting oil from the ground. But there's a chance that after billions of dollars and half a century of research that fusion won't be useful for energy.
MasterAndrey2 t1_j08mu28 wrote
Reply to comment by 8th_Floor in [OC] World collective security arrangements for the United States, China, and Russia, with each's share of world GDP. by MST3KTFCCTRT
There's also extra
GDP = private consumption + gross private investment + government investment + government spending + (exports – imports)